GeForce RTX 4090 vs Radeon RX 6750 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6750 XT and GeForce RTX 4090, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 6750 XT
2022
12 GB GDDR6, 250 Watt
53.95

RTX 4090 outperforms RX 6750 XT by an impressive 85% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking471
Place by popularitynot in top-1006
Cost-effectiveness evaluation51.7318.81
Power efficiency15.0015.45
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 22AD102
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date3 March 2022 (2 years ago)20 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549 $1,599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6750 XT has 175% better value for money than RTX 4090.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256016384
Core clock speed2150 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speed2600 MHz2520 MHz
Number of transistors17,200 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt450 Watt
Texture fill rate416.01,290
Floating-point processing power13.31 TFLOPS82.58 TFLOPS
ROPs64176
TMUs160512
Tensor Coresno data512
Ray Tracing Cores40128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm304 mm
Width2-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount12 GB24 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth432.0 GB/s1.01 TB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6750 XT 53.95
RTX 4090 100.00
+85.4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6750 XT 20815
RTX 4090 38581
+85.4%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 6750 XT 48327
RTX 4090 104598
+116%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 6750 XT 104004
RTX 4090 137609
+32.3%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 6750 XT 37609
RTX 4090 73447
+95.3%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 6750 XT 170993
RTX 4090 260357
+52.3%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 6750 XT 529598
RTX 4090 771257
+45.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD165
−61.8%
267
+61.8%
1440p88
−132%
204
+132%
4K51
−190%
148
+190%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.335.99
1440p6.247.84
4K10.7610.80

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 165
−36.4%
225
+36.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 110−120
−110%
235
+110%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90−95
−205%
287
+205%
Battlefield 5 170−180
−42.7%
240−250
+42.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
−15.4%
120−130
+15.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 127
−74.8%
222
+74.8%
Far Cry 5 100−110
−12.4%
110−120
+12.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 130−140
−54.6%
200−210
+54.6%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
−32.9%
290−300
+32.9%
Hitman 3 110−120
−14.2%
120−130
+14.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 200−210
−69.2%
350−400
+69.2%
Metro Exodus 150−160
−3.3%
150−160
+3.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
−11.7%
120−130
+11.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 210−220
−118%
450−500
+118%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
−6.9%
150−160
+6.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 110−120
−81.3%
200−210
+81.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90−95
−164%
248
+164%
Battlefield 5 170−180
−42.7%
240−250
+42.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
−15.4%
120−130
+15.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 109
−96.3%
214
+96.3%
Far Cry 5 100−110
−12.4%
110−120
+12.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 130−140
−54.6%
200−210
+54.6%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
−32.9%
290−300
+32.9%
Hitman 3 110−120
−14.2%
120−130
+14.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 200−210
−69.2%
350−400
+69.2%
Metro Exodus 150−160
−3.3%
150−160
+3.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
−11.7%
120−130
+11.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 304
−80.3%
548
+80.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
−115%
240−250
+115%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
−6.9%
150−160
+6.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 110−120
−59.8%
179
+59.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90−95
−134%
220
+134%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
−15.4%
120−130
+15.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 98
−114%
210
+114%
Far Cry 5 100−110
−12.4%
110−120
+12.4%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
−32.9%
290−300
+32.9%
Hitman 3 110−120
−14.2%
120−130
+14.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210
−87.6%
394
+87.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 260
−108%
541
+108%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 135
−126%
305
+126%
Watch Dogs: Legion 98
−56.1%
153
+56.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
−11.7%
120−130
+11.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
−48.2%
160−170
+48.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
−34.9%
110−120
+34.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
−154%
155
+154%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
−186%
183
+186%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
−28.1%
80−85
+28.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 60
−157%
154
+157%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−33.3%
80−85
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 260−270
−1.9%
270−280
+1.9%
Hitman 3 75−80
−84%
130−140
+84%
Horizon Zero Dawn 158
−146%
388
+146%
Metro Exodus 126
−20.6%
152
+20.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 186
−171%
504
+171%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
−205%
268
+205%
Watch Dogs: Legion 220−230
−7.1%
240−250
+7.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
−40.2%
120−130
+40.2%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−49.2%
85−90
+49.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−38%
65−70
+38%
Hitman 3 45−50
−84.4%
80−85
+84.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
+103%
105
−103%
Metro Exodus 75−80
−86.8%
140−150
+86.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 79
−256%
281
+256%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−200%
120
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−216%
120
+216%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−36.8%
50−55
+36.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 26
−208%
80
+208%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−42.9%
50−55
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−220%
250−260
+220%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 99
−185%
282
+185%
Watch Dogs: Legion 41
−185%
117
+185%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−113%
110−120
+113%

This is how RX 6750 XT and RTX 4090 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4090 is 62% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4090 is 132% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4090 is 190% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6750 XT is 103% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4090 is 256% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6750 XT is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • RTX 4090 is ahead in 71 test (99%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 53.95 100.00
Recency 3 March 2022 20 September 2022
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 450 Watt

RX 6750 XT has 80% lower power consumption.

RTX 4090, on the other hand, has a 85.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4090 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6750 XT in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
Radeon RX 6750 XT
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
GeForce RTX 4090

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 2505 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 14260 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.