Arc A770 vs Radeon RX 6750 XT

Place in the ranking	47	154
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	51.12	55.19
Power efficiency	14.91	10.49
Architecture	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code name	Navi 22	DG2-512
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	3 March 2022 (2 years ago)	12 October 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$549	$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Arc A770 has 8% better value for money than RX 6750 XT.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	4096
Core clock speed	2150 MHz	2100 MHz
Boost clock speed	2600 MHz	2400 MHz
Number of transistors	17,200 million	21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	225 Watt
Texture fill rate	416.0	614.4
Floating-point processing power	13.31 TFLOPS	19.66 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	128
TMUs	160	256
Tensor Cores	no data	512
Ray Tracing Cores	40	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	2250 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	432.0 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI	+	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6750 XT 54.04
+58%

Arc A770 34.21

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6750 XT 20778
+58%

Arc A770 13154

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 6750 XT 48327
+17%

Arc A770 41303

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 6750 XT 104004
+0.7%

Arc A770 103295

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 6750 XT 37609
+15.1%

Arc A770 32666

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 6750 XT 170993
+22.9%

Arc A770 139166

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 6750 XT 529598

Arc A770 628292
+18.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	165 +47.3%	112 −47.3%
1440p	87 +35.9%	64 −35.9%
4K	51 +24.4%	41 −24.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	3.33 −13.3%	2.94 +13.3%
1440p	6.31 −22.8%	5.14 +22.8%
4K	10.76 −34.1%	8.02 +34.1%

Arc A770 has 13% lower cost per frame in 1080p
Arc A770 has 23% lower cost per frame in 1440p
Arc A770 has 34% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	166 +43.1%	116 −43.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	165 +129%	70−75 −129%
Elden Ring	197 +124%	88 −124%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +21.9%	95−100 −21.9%
Counter-Strike 2	130 +31.3%	99 −31.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	64 −12.5%	70−75 +12.5%
Forza Horizon 4	368 +21.1%	304 −21.1%
Metro Exodus	150 +25%	120 −25%
Red Dead Redemption 2	100−105 +44.9%	65−70 −44.9%
Valorant	230−240 +70.6%	130−140 −70.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +21.9%	95−100 −21.9%
Counter-Strike 2	109 +23.9%	88 −23.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	54 −33.3%	70−75 +33.3%
Dota 2	159 +51.4%	105 −51.4%
Elden Ring	66 −77.3%	110−120 +77.3%
Far Cry 5	49 −44.9%	71 +44.9%
Fortnite	210−220 +38.5%	150−160 −38.5%
Forza Horizon 4	304 +17.8%	258 −17.8%
Grand Theft Auto V	162 +54.3%	105 −54.3%
Metro Exodus	120 +21.2%	99 −21.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +13.8%	180−190 −13.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	100−105 +44.9%	65−70 −44.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 +47.5%	110−120 −47.5%
Valorant	230−240 +70.6%	130−140 −70.6%
World of Tanks	270−280 +0.4%	270−280 −0.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +21.9%	95−100 −21.9%
Counter-Strike 2	96 +15.7%	83 −15.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	49 −46.9%	70−75 +46.9%
Dota 2	131 +63.8%	80−85 −63.8%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +24.2%	90−95 −24.2%
Forza Horizon 4	260 +20.4%	216 −20.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +13.8%	180−190 −13.8%
Valorant	230−240 +70.6%	130−140 −70.6%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	106 +136%	45 −136%
Elden Ring	126 +90.9%	65−70 −90.9%
Grand Theft Auto V	106 +136%	45 −136%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +81.8%	30−35 −81.8%
World of Tanks	300−350 +58.9%	210−220 −58.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +28.8%	65−70 −28.8%
Counter-Strike 2	57 −3.5%	59 +3.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	30 −10%	30−35 +10%
Far Cry 5	160−170 +46.8%	100−110 −46.8%
Forza Horizon 4	186 +17.7%	158 −17.7%
Metro Exodus	126 +38.5%	91 −38.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−110 +80%	60 −80%
Valorant	190−200 +95.1%	100−110 −95.1%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	33 +17.9%	28 −17.9%
Dota 2	104 +117%	48 −117%
Elden Ring	59 +90.3%	30−35 −90.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	104 +117%	48 −117%
Metro Exodus	47 +0%	47 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	180−190 +74.1%	100−110 −74.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +77.3%	21−24 −77.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	104 +117%	48 −117%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 +74.4%	35−40 −74.4%
Counter-Strike 2	60−65 +79.4%	30−35 −79.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	13 −7.7%	14−16 +7.7%
Dota 2	101 +68.3%	60−65 −68.3%
Far Cry 5	90−95 +95.8%	45−50 −95.8%
Fortnite	90−95 +95.7%	45−50 −95.7%
Forza Horizon 4	99 +11.2%	89 −11.2%
Valorant	110−120 +113%	50−55 −113%

This is how RX 6750 XT and Arc A770 compete in popular games:

RX 6750 XT is 47% faster in 1080p
RX 6750 XT is 36% faster in 1440p
RX 6750 XT is 24% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Dota 2, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6750 XT is 136% faster.
in Elden Ring, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A770 is 77% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 6750 XT is ahead in 51 test (84%)
Arc A770 is ahead in 8 tests (13%)
there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	54.04	34.21
Recency	3 March 2022	12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	225 Watt

RX 6750 XT has a 58% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc A770, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 11.1% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6750 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A770 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.