RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile vs Radeon RX 6650M XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6300M 6450M 6500 6500M 6550M 6550S 6600M 6600S 6650M 6650M XT 6700M 6700S 6800M 6800S 6850M XT
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
1000 Blackwell Mobile 2000 Blackwell Embedded 2000 Blackwell Mobile 3000 Blackwell Mobile 4000 Blackwell Embedded 4000 Blackwell Mobile 5000 Blackwell Embedded 5000 Blackwell Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6650M XT with RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RX 6650M XT
2022
8 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
40.79
+14.9%

6650M XT outperforms RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RX 6650M XT RX 6650M XT
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking113156
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency26.1260.60
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameNavi 23GB206
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date4 January 2022 (3 years ago)19 March 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20483328
Core clock speed2068 MHz952 MHz
Boost clock speed2416 MHz1657 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million21,900 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate309.2172.3
Floating-point processing power9.896 TFLOPS11.03 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs128104
Tensor Coresno data104
Ray Tracing Cores3226
L0 Cache512 KBno data
L1 Cache512 KB3.3 MB
L2 Cache2 MB32 MB
L3 Cache32 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD140−150
+7.7%
130
−7.7%
1440p75−80
+8.7%
69
−8.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+12.5%
200−210
−12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+16.9%
80−85
−16.9%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 130−140
+8.7%
120−130
−8.7%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+12.5%
200−210
−12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+16.9%
80−85
−16.9%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+1.7%
110−120
−1.7%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+13.9%
110−120
−13.9%
Fortnite 170−180
+12%
150−160
−12%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+13.7%
130−140
−13.7%
Forza Horizon 5 130−140
+15%
110−120
−15%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+11.2%
140−150
−11.2%
Valorant 230−240
+10.3%
210−220
−10.3%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 130−140
+8.7%
120−130
−8.7%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+12.5%
200−210
−12.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+16.9%
80−85
−16.9%
Dota 2 140−150
+21.7%
120−130
−21.7%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+1.7%
110−120
−1.7%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+13.9%
110−120
−13.9%
Fortnite 170−180
+12%
150−160
−12%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+13.7%
130−140
−13.7%
Forza Horizon 5 130−140
+15%
110−120
−15%
Grand Theft Auto V 130−140
−8.2%
145
+8.2%
Metro Exodus 95−100
+17.9%
80−85
−17.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+11.2%
140−150
−11.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160
+22%
120−130
−22%
Valorant 230−240
+10.3%
210−220
−10.3%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+8.7%
120−130
−8.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+16.9%
80−85
−16.9%
Dota 2 140−150
+21.7%
120−130
−21.7%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+1.7%
110−120
−1.7%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+13.9%
110−120
−13.9%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+13.7%
130−140
−13.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+11.2%
140−150
−11.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160
+22%
120−130
−22%
Valorant 230−240
+18%
200−210
−18%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 170−180
+12%
150−160
−12%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+20.5%
85−90
−20.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 280−290
+15.1%
250−260
−15.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 85−90
−2.3%
88
+2.3%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+17.3%
50−55
−17.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+16.7%
150−160
−16.7%
Valorant 260−270
+8.1%
240−250
−8.1%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+11.8%
90−95
−11.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+19.5%
40−45
−19.5%
Escape from Tarkov 95−100
+14%
85−90
−14%
Far Cry 5 100−105
+16.3%
85−90
−16.3%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+19%
100−105
−19%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+21.2%
65−70
−21.2%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 110−120
+18.3%
90−95
−18.3%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+20%
40−45
−20%
Grand Theft Auto V 90−95
+19.7%
75−80
−19.7%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+18.8%
30−35
−18.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+17.9%
55−60
−17.9%
Valorant 250−260
+14.2%
210−220
−14.2%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+15.8%
55−60
−15.8%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+20%
40−45
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Dota 2 110−120
+15%
100−105
−15%
Escape from Tarkov 50−55
+20.9%
40−45
−20.9%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+19.6%
45−50
−19.6%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+19.4%
65−70
−19.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+26.1%
45−50
−26.1%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+22.2%
45−50
−22.2%

This is how RX 6650M XT and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RX 6650M XT is 8% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6650M XT is 9% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6650M XT is 26% faster.
  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is 8% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6650M XT performs better in 55 tests (95%)
  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile performs better in 2 tests (3%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 40.79 35.49
Recency 4 January 2022 19 March 2025
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 45 Watt

RX 6650M XT has a 14.9% higher aggregate performance score.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 166.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6650M XT is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6650M XT is a notebook graphics card while RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT
Radeon RX 6650M XT
NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX 6650M XT Radeon RX 6650M XT
vs
GTX 1070 SLI Mobile GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
vs
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RX 6650M XT Radeon RX 6650M XT
vs
RTX 5060 Mobile GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile
Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile Intel Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile
vs
GeForce MX550 GeForce MX550
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
vs
RTX 3050 4 GB RTX 3050 4 GB
RX 7600S AMD Radeon RX 7600S
vs
Radeon 680M Radeon 680M
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU
vs
Radeon 660M Radeon 660M
RTX 5090 Mobile 5090 Mobile
vs
RX 6650M XT Radeon RX 6650M XT
Arc 7 A770M Intel Arc 7 A770M
vs
RX 6650M RX 6650M
RTX 5070 5070
vs
RX 6650M Radeon RX 6650M
RX 6650M AMD RX 6650M
vs
RX 7800M RX 7800M
Radeon 860M AMD Radeon 860M
vs
RX 6650M RX 6650M
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q
vs
RX 6700S RX 6700S

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.2 76 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6650M XT or RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.