Radeon PRO W7700 vs RX 6600 XT

Place in performance ranking	78	45
Place by popularity	91	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	48.58	24.84
Architecture	Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)	RDNA 3.0 (2022)
GPU code name	Navi 23	Navi 32
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	30 July 2021 (2 years ago)	13 November 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$379	$999
Current price	$283 (0.7x MSRP)	$999 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6600 XT has 96% better value for money than PRO W7700.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	3072
Core clock speed	1968 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2589 MHz	2600 MHz
Number of transistors	11,060 million	28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	160 (TGP) Watt	190 Watt
Texture fill rate	331.4	499.2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	190 mm	241 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	16000 MHz	18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	256.0 GB/s	576.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort	4x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12.0 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	2.2
Vulkan	1.2	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6600 XT 42.70

PRO W7700 51.83
+21.4%

PRO W7700 outperforms RX 6600 XT by 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 6600 XT 16490

PRO W7700 20016
+21.4%

PRO W7700 outperforms RX 6600 XT by 21% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	128 −17.2%	150−160 +17.2%
1440p	75 −20%	90−95 +20%
4K	41 −9.8%	45−50 +9.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

65−70

−21.5%

79
+21.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 −23.3%	70−75 +23.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−105 −29%	129 +29%
Battlefield 5	110−120 −24.5%	130−140 +24.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 −22.9%	85−90 +22.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 −30%	78 +30%
Far Cry 5	70−75 −30%	90−95 +30%
Far Cry New Dawn	85−90 −23.5%	100−110 +23.5%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 −21.5%	150−160 +21.5%
Hitman 3	85−90 −27.1%	108 +27.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	230−240 −25.7%	289 +25.7%
Metro Exodus	95−100 −24.2%	110−120 +24.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85 −25%	100−105 +25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	210−220 −22.4%	257 +22.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	95−100 −26.3%	120 +26.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 −23.3%	70−75 +23.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	85−90 −24.7%	106 +24.7%
Battlefield 5	110−120 −24.5%	130−140 +24.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 −22.9%	85−90 +22.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 −26.7%	76 +26.7%
Far Cry 5	70−75 −30%	90−95 +30%
Far Cry New Dawn	85−90 −23.5%	100−110 +23.5%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 −21.5%	150−160 +21.5%
Hitman 3	75−80 −25.3%	94 +25.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	140−150 −24.3%	170−180 +24.3%
Metro Exodus	50−55 −28%	64 +28%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85 −25%	100−105 +25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	170−180 −22.9%	209 +22.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	140−150 −25.7%	176 +25.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85 −27.5%	100−110 +27.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 −23.3%	70−75 +23.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 −25%	75 +25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 −22.9%	85−90 +22.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 −25.5%	69 +25.5%
Far Cry 5	70−75 −30%	90−95 +30%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 −21.5%	150−160 +21.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 −30.8%	157 +30.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	150−160 −22%	183 +22%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	80−85 −23.8%	99 +23.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −22%	61 +22%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

80−85
−25%

100−105

+25%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 −27.7%	80−85 +27.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85 −25%	100−105 +25%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −34.3%	45−50 +34.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 −24.4%	56 +24.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −32%	65−70 +32%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 −33.3%	40 +33.3%
Far Cry 5	85−90 −23.5%	105 +23.5%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −28.6%	90−95 +28.6%
Hitman 3	55−60 −21.8%	67 +21.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	95−100 −22.1%	116 +22.1%
Metro Exodus	80−85 −22.5%	98 +22.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	95−100 −24.2%	118 +24.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 −28%	60−65 +28%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −25.7%	44 +25.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

60−65

−23.3%

70−75
+23.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −22.9%	40−45 +22.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 −23.3%	35−40 +23.3%
Hitman 3	27−30 −22.2%	33 +22.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −22.2%	55−60 +22.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 −33.3%	40 +33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 −35%	54 +35%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −25%	30−33 +25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −33.3%	28 +33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −33.3%	27−30 +33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −40%	14 +40%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −38.9%	24−27 +38.9%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −33.3%	60−65 +33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −32%	66 +32%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −32.5%	53 +32.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −33.3%	24 +33.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−33

−30%

35−40
+30%

This is how RX 6600 XT and PRO W7700 compete in popular games:

PRO W7700 is 17% faster in 1080p
PRO W7700 is 20% faster in 1440p
PRO W7700 is 10% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	42.70	51.83
Recency	30 July 2021	13 November 2023
Cost	$379	$999
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	160 Watt	190 Watt