Radeon PRO W7800 vs RX 6600 XT

Place in performance ranking	78	11
Place by popularity	91	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	48.48	9.20
Architecture	Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)	RDNA 3.0 (2022)
GPU code name	Navi 23	Navi 31
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	30 July 2021 (2 years ago)	13 April 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$379	$2,499
Current price	$283 (0.7x MSRP)	$3907 (1.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6600 XT has 427% better value for money than PRO W7800.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	4480
Core clock speed	1968 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2589 MHz	2499 MHz
Number of transistors	11,060 million	57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	160 (TGP) Watt	260 Watt
Texture fill rate	331.4	699.7

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	190 mm	280 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	32 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	16000 MHz	18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	256.0 GB/s	576.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort	3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12.0 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	2.2
Vulkan	1.2	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6600 XT 42.69

PRO W7800 75.27
+76.3%

PRO W7800 outperforms RX 6600 XT by 76% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 6600 XT 16488

PRO W7800 29070
+76.3%

PRO W7800 outperforms RX 6600 XT by 76% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	128 −71.9%	220−230 +71.9%
1440p	75 −73.3%	130−140 +73.3%
4K	41 −70.7%	70−75 +70.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

40−45

−97.5%

79
+97.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −85%	70−75 +85%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	70−75 −84.3%	129 +84.3%
Battlefield 5	75−80 −82.7%	130−140 +82.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −91.1%	85−90 +91.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 −95%	78 +95%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −82%	90−95 +82%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 −90.9%	100−110 +90.9%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 −84.7%	150−160 +84.7%
Hitman 3	60−65 −80%	108 +80%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 −80.6%	289 +80.6%
Metro Exodus	65−70 −81.5%	110−120 +81.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 −81.8%	100−105 +81.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	140−150 −83.6%	257 +83.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −84.6%	120 +84.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −85%	70−75 +85%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 −76.7%	106 +76.7%
Battlefield 5	75−80 −82.7%	130−140 +82.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −91.1%	85−90 +91.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 −90%	76 +90%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −82%	90−95 +82%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 −90.9%	100−110 +90.9%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 −84.7%	150−160 +84.7%
Hitman 3	50−55 −88%	94 +88%
Horizon Zero Dawn	95−100 −83.2%	170−180 +83.2%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −82.9%	64 +82.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 −81.8%	100−105 +81.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110−120 −90%	209 +90%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	95−100 −85.3%	176 +85.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −85.5%	100−110 +85.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −85%	70−75 +85%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 −87.5%	75 +87.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −91.1%	85−90 +91.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −97.1%	69 +97.1%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −82%	90−95 +82%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 −84.7%	150−160 +84.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	85−90 −84.7%	157 +84.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−105 −83%	183 +83%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 −80%	99 +80%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −103%	61 +103%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

55−60
−81.8%

100−105

+81.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 −84.4%	80−85 +84.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 −81.8%	100−105 +81.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −95.8%	45−50 +95.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 −86.7%	56 +86.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 −88.6%	65−70 +88.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −90.5%	40 +90.5%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −90.9%	105 +90.9%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −80%	90−95 +80%
Hitman 3	35−40 −91.4%	67 +91.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 −78.5%	116 +78.5%
Metro Exodus	55−60 −78.2%	98 +78.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 −81.5%	118 +81.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −82.9%	60−65 +82.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 −83.3%	44 +83.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45

−85%

70−75
+85%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −79.2%	40−45 +79.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −106%	35−40 +106%
Hitman 3	18−20 −83.3%	33 +83.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 −83.3%	55−60 +83.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −90.5%	40 +90.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 −80%	54 +80%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −87.5%	30−33 +87.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −100%	28 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −100%	27−30 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −100%	14 +100%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −78.6%	24−27 +78.6%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 −100%	60−65 +100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −88.6%	66 +88.6%
Metro Exodus	30−33 −76.7%	53 +76.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 −100%	24 +100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24

−85.7%

35−40
+85.7%

This is how RX 6600 XT and PRO W7800 compete in popular games:

PRO W7800 is 72% faster in 1080p
PRO W7800 is 73% faster in 1440p
PRO W7800 is 71% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	42.69	75.27
Recency	30 July 2021	13 April 2023
Cost	$379	$2499
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	32 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	160 Watt	260 Watt