ATI Radeon X1650 SE vs RX 6500M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6500M with Radeon X1650 SE, including specs and performance data.

RX 6500M
2022
4 GB GDDR6, 50 Watt
19.79
+10894%

RX 6500M outperforms ATI X1650 SE by a whopping 10894% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2901410
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency27.150.46
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Ultra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)
GPU code nameNavi 24RV515
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 January 2022 (3 years ago)2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024no data
Core clock speed2000 MHz635 MHz
Boost clock speed2400 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,400 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt27 Watt
Texture fill rate153.62.540
Floating-point processing power4.915 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs644
Ray Tracing Cores16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz800 MBps
Memory bandwidth144.0 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.63.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.2N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 6500M 19.79
+10894%
ATI X1650 SE 0.18

  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6500M 7623
+10637%
ATI X1650 SE 71

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD640−1

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 45−50 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 45 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 66 0−1
Atomic Heart 45−50 0−1
Battlefield 5 75−80 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 39 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 67 0−1
Far Cry 5 75 0−1
Fortnite 95−100 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 75−80 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 68 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75 0−1
Valorant 140−150
+13900%
1−2
−13900%
Atomic Heart 45−50 0−1
Battlefield 5 75−80 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 28 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+11250%
2−3
−11250%
Cyberpunk 2077 32 0−1
Dota 2 102 0−1
Far Cry 5 71 0−1
Fortnite 95−100 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 75−80 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 50−55 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 69 0−1
Metro Exodus 50 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 57 0−1
Valorant 140−150
+13900%
1−2
−13900%
Battlefield 5 75−80 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 35−40 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 29 0−1
Dota 2 95 0−1
Far Cry 5 66 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 75−80 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 43 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39 0−1
Valorant 140−150
+13900%
1−2
−13900%
Fortnite 95−100 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+13400%
1−2
−13400%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35 0−1
Metro Exodus 24−27 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+17000%
1−2
−17000%
Valorant 170−180
+17600%
1−2
−17600%
Battlefield 5 50−55 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 20−22 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 0−1
Far Cry 5 40−45 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 30−35 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33 0−1
Fortnite 40−45 0−1
Atomic Heart 14−16 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 9−10 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35 0−1
Metro Exodus 14−16 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30 0−1
Valorant 100−110 0−1
Battlefield 5 27−30 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 9−10 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 0−1
Dota 2 60−65 0−1
Far Cry 5 20−22 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 30−35 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 16−18 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20 0−1
Fortnite 18−20 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.79 0.18
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 6 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 27 Watt

RX 6500M has a 10894.4% higher aggregate performance score, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X1650 SE, on the other hand, has 85.2% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6500M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X1650 SE in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6500M is a notebook card while Radeon X1650 SE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6500M
Radeon RX 6500M
ATI Radeon X1650 SE
Radeon X1650 SE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7
530 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon X1650 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6500M or Radeon X1650 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.