ATI Radeon X1650 SE vs RX 6650M XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6300M 6450M 6500 6500M 6550M 6550S 6600M 6600S 6650M 6650M XT 6700M 6700S 6800M 6800S 6850M XT
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
All-In-Wonder 2006 Edition All-In-Wonder 2006 Edition X1300 All-In-Wonder 2006 PCIe Edition X1300 X1300 AGP X1300 LE X1300 PRO X1300 PRO AGP X1600 SE X1650 SE

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6650M XT with Radeon X1650 SE, including specs and performance data.

RX 6650M XT
2022
8 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
40.82
+23912%

6650M XT outperforms X1650 SE by a whopping 23912% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RX 6650M XT RX 6650M XT
ATI X1650 SE X1650 SE

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1131475
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency26.190.48
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Ultra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)
GPU code nameNavi 23RV515
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 January 2022 (4 years ago)2007 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speed2068 MHz635 MHz
Boost clock speed2416 MHzno data
Number of transistors11,060 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt27 Watt
Texture fill rate309.22.540
Floating-point processing power9.896 TFLOPSno data
ROPs644
TMUs1284
Ray Tracing Cores32no data
L0 Cache512 KBno data
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data
L3 Cache32 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz800 MBps
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.53.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 6650M XT 40.82
+23912%
ATI X1650 SE 0.17

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6650M XT 16081
+22549%
Samples: 3
ATI X1650 SE 71
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 220−230 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100 0−1
Resident Evil 4 Remake 110−120 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 130−140 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 220−230 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100 0−1
Far Cry 5 130−140 0−1
Fortnite 170−180 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 150−160 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 130−140 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160 0−1
Valorant 230−240 0−1

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 130−140 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 220−230 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+27800%
1−2
−27800%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100 0−1
Dota 2 140−150 0−1
Far Cry 5 130−140 0−1
Fortnite 170−180 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 150−160 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 130−140 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 130−140 0−1
Metro Exodus 95−100 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160 0−1
Valorant 230−240 0−1

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100 0−1
Dota 2 140−150 0−1
Far Cry 5 130−140 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 150−160 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160 0−1
Valorant 230−240 0−1

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 170−180 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 100−110 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 290−300
+28900%
1−2
−28900%
Grand Theft Auto V 85−90 0−1
Metro Exodus 60−65 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 0−1
Valorant 260−270
+26600%
1−2
−26600%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 0−1
Far Cry 5 100−110 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 110−120 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 110−120 0−1

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 90−95 0−1
Metro Exodus 35−40 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70 0−1
Valorant 250−260
+25000%
1−2
−25000%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 45−50 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 0−1
Dota 2 110−120 0−1
Far Cry 5 55−60 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 80−85 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 55−60 0−1

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 40.82 0.17
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 27 Watt

RX 6650M XT has a 23912% higher aggregate performance score, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1186% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X1650 SE, on the other hand, has 344% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6650M XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X1650 SE in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6650M XT is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X1650 SE is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX 6650M XT Radeon RX 6650M XT
vs
RTX 5060 Mobile GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile
ATI X1650 SE Radeon X1650 SE
vs
ATI X1600 Radeon X1600
RX 6650M XT Radeon RX 6650M XT
vs
RX 6850M XT Radeon RX 6850M XT
Radeon 660M Radeon 660M
vs
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Embedded RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Embedded
RX 6800S Radeon RX 6800S
vs
RTX A5000 Max-Q RTX A5000 Max-Q
RX 6800S Radeon RX 6800S
vs
9200M GS GDDR3 GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3
RX 6750 GRE RX 6750 GRE
vs
RX 6800S RX 6800S
RX 6800S RX 6800S
vs
RTX 5070 5070
RX 6650M XT Radeon RX 6650M XT
vs
Arc A380M Arc A380M
RX 6650M XT Radeon RX 6650M XT
vs
HD Graphics 10EU HD Graphics 10EU
RX 6650M XT Radeon RX 6650M XT
vs
Apple M3 Max 30-Core GPU M3 Max 30-Core GPU
RX 6650M XT Radeon RX 6650M XT
vs
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS
RX 7900 GRE RX 7900 GRE
vs
RX 6650M RX 6650M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.2 79 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon X1650 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6650M XT or Radeon X1650 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.