T550 Mobile vs Radeon RX 6800M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6800M with T550 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RX 6800M
2021
12 GB GDDR6, 145 Watt
29.69
+176%

RX 6800M outperforms T550 Mobile by a whopping 176% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking160412
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.2437.11
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 22TU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date31 May 2021 (3 years ago)May 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25601024
Core clock speed2116 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speed2390 MHz1665 MHz
Number of transistors17,200 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate382.4106.6
Floating-point processing power12.24 TFLOPS3.41 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs16064
Ray Tracing Cores40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB4 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 6800M 29.69
+176%
T550 Mobile 10.76

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6800M 13266
+176%
T550 Mobile 4807

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 6800M 40391
+401%
T550 Mobile 8067

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 6800M 77244
+207%
T550 Mobile 25155

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 6800M 34199
+599%
T550 Mobile 4890

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 6800M 160859
+384%
T550 Mobile 33219

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RX 6800M 11257
+484%
T550 Mobile 1928

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD107
+110%
51
−110%
1440p71
+196%
24−27
−196%
4K43
+207%
14−16
−207%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 154
+431%
27−30
−431%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+189%
60−65
−189%
Cyberpunk 2077 123
+413%
24−27
−413%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 121
+317%
27−30
−317%
Battlefield 5 143
+180%
50−55
−180%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+189%
60−65
−189%
Cyberpunk 2077 110
+358%
24−27
−358%
Far Cry 5 106
+159%
41
−159%
Fortnite 140−150
+113%
65−70
−113%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+150%
50−55
−150%
Forza Horizon 5 131
+254%
35−40
−254%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+205%
40−45
−205%
Valorant 190−200
+91.3%
100−110
−91.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 85
+193%
27−30
−193%
Battlefield 5 141
+176%
50−55
−176%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+189%
60−65
−189%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+64.3%
160−170
−64.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 102
+325%
24−27
−325%
Dota 2 126
+37%
92
−37%
Far Cry 5 102
+168%
38
−168%
Fortnite 140−150
+113%
65−70
−113%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+150%
50−55
−150%
Forza Horizon 5 125
+238%
35−40
−238%
Grand Theft Auto V 112
+149%
45
−149%
Metro Exodus 105
+338%
24−27
−338%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+205%
40−45
−205%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 188
+370%
40
−370%
Valorant 190−200
+91.3%
100−110
−91.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 139
+173%
50−55
−173%
Cyberpunk 2077 98
+308%
24−27
−308%
Dota 2 115
+35.3%
85
−35.3%
Far Cry 5 95
+171%
35
−171%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+150%
50−55
−150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+205%
40−45
−205%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 109
+445%
20
−445%
Valorant 190−200
+91.3%
100−110
−91.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 140−150
+113%
65−70
−113%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+255%
21−24
−255%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+152%
85−90
−152%
Grand Theft Auto V 84
+367%
18−20
−367%
Metro Exodus 59
+321%
14−16
−321%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+108%
80−85
−108%
Valorant 230−240
+86.5%
120−130
−86.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130
+319%
30−35
−319%
Cyberpunk 2077 51
+410%
10−11
−410%
Far Cry 5 100
+300%
24−27
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+214%
27−30
−214%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+205%
18−20
−205%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 80−85
+228%
24−27
−228%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+189%
9−10
−189%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+500%
6−7
−500%
Grand Theft Auto V 85
+270%
21−24
−270%
Metro Exodus 38
+375%
8−9
−375%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
+300%
14−16
−300%
Valorant 190−200
+208%
60−65
−208%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 82
+413%
16−18
−413%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+500%
6−7
−500%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+475%
4−5
−475%
Dota 2 95
+121%
40−45
−121%
Far Cry 5 61
+408%
12−14
−408%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+190%
20−22
−190%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+255%
10−12
−255%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+255%
10−12
−255%

This is how RX 6800M and T550 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RX 6800M is 110% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6800M is 196% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6800M is 207% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6800M is 500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 6800M surpassed T550 Mobile in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.69 10.76
Recency 31 May 2021 on May 2022
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 23 Watt

RX 6800M has a 175.9% higher aggregate performance score, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

T550 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, and 530.4% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6800M is our recommended choice as it beats the T550 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6800M is a notebook graphics card while T550 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6800M
Radeon RX 6800M
NVIDIA T550 Mobile
T550

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 324 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 27 votes

Rate T550 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6800M or T550 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.