Radeon RX 6650M vs RX 580

Place in the ranking	245	117
Place by popularity	1	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	18.16	no data
Power efficiency	8.58	22.44
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Polaris 20	Navi 23
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	18 April 2017 (7 years ago)	4 January 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$229	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	1792
Core clock speed	1257 MHz	2068 MHz
Boost clock speed	1340 MHz	2416 MHz
Number of transistors	5,700 million	11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	185 Watt	120 Watt
Texture fill rate	193.0	270.6
Floating-point processing power	6.175 TFLOPS	8.659 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	64
TMUs	144	112
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	241 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	256.0 GB/s	256.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 580 23.01

RX 6650M 39.02
+69.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 580 8847

RX 6650M 15004
+69.6%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 580 19274

RX 6650M 32846
+70.4%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 580 13927

RX 6650M 25739
+84.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	96 −20.8%	116 +20.8%
1440p	44 −59.1%	70−75 +59.1%
4K	38 −57.9%	60−65 +57.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.39	no data
1440p	5.20	no data
4K	6.03	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	40−45 −92.9%	80−85 +92.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 −176%	127 +176%
Elden Ring	75−80 +8.7%	69 −8.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	80 −30%	100−110 +30%
Counter-Strike 2	40−45 −92.9%	80−85 +92.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 −15.2%	53 +15.2%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 −124%	222 +124%
Metro Exodus	83 −13.3%	90−95 +13.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 −51%	75−80 +51%
Valorant	90−95 −67.7%	150−160 +67.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	117 +12.5%	100−110 −12.5%
Counter-Strike 2	40−45 −92.9%	80−85 +92.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +17.9%	39 −17.9%
Dota 2	51 +30.8%	39 −30.8%
Elden Ring	75−80 −82.7%	130−140 +82.7%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +58.7%	46 −58.7%
Fortnite	110−120 −44.9%	170−180 +44.9%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 −91.9%	190 +91.9%
Grand Theft Auto V	77 −58.4%	120−130 +58.4%
Metro Exodus	57 +72.7%	33 −72.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	202 +1%	200−210 −1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 −51%	75−80 +51%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	70−75 −86.5%	130−140 +86.5%
Valorant	90−95 −67.7%	150−160 +67.7%
World of Tanks	240−250 −12%	270−280 +12%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	68 −52.9%	100−110 +52.9%
Counter-Strike 2	40−45 −92.9%	80−85 +92.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +43.8%	32 −43.8%
Dota 2	80−85 −25%	100 +25%
Far Cry 5	70−75 −32.9%	95−100 +32.9%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 −68.7%	167 +68.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70 −186%	200−210 +186%
Valorant	90−95 −67.7%	150−160 +67.7%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	35−40 −89.5%	70−75 +89.5%
Elden Ring	40−45 −97.5%	75−80 +97.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	35−40 −89.5%	70−75 +89.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 −0.6%	170−180 +0.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −85.7%	35−40 +85.7%
World of Tanks	150−160 −60.4%	240−250 +60.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 −53.2%	70−75 +53.2%
Counter-Strike 2	18−20 −105%	35−40 +105%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −105%	35−40 +105%
Far Cry 5	65−70 −93.8%	120−130 +93.8%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −88.3%	110−120 +88.3%
Metro Exodus	53 −60.4%	85−90 +60.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 −106%	65−70 +106%
Valorant	60−65 −100%	120−130 +100%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	20−22 −100%	40−45 +100%
Dota 2	57 −35.1%	75−80 +35.1%
Elden Ring	18−20 −111%	35−40 +111%
Grand Theft Auto V	57 −35.1%	75−80 +35.1%
Metro Exodus	18 −83.3%	30−35 +83.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	73 −72.6%	120−130 +72.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −66.7%	24−27 +66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	57 −35.1%	75−80 +35.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	28 −60.7%	45−50 +60.7%
Counter-Strike 2	20−22 −100%	40−45 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −143%	16−18 +143%
Dota 2	35−40 −97.4%	75−80 +97.4%
Far Cry 5	30−33 −93.3%	55−60 +93.3%
Fortnite	31 −77.4%	55−60 +77.4%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −82.9%	60−65 +82.9%
Valorant	27−30 −121%	60−65 +121%

This is how RX 580 and RX 6650M compete in popular games:

RX 6650M is 21% faster in 1080p
RX 6650M is 59% faster in 1440p
RX 6650M is 58% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 580 is 73% faster.
in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6650M is 186% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 580 is ahead in 8 tests (13%)
RX 6650M is ahead in 55 tests (87%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	23.01	39.02
Recency	18 April 2017	4 January 2022
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	185 Watt	120 Watt

RX 6650M has a 69.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 54.2% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6650M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 580 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 580 is a desktop card while Radeon RX 6650M is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.