Radeon RX 6750 XT vs RX 580

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 580 and Radeon RX 6750 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 580
2017
8 GB GDDR5, 185 Watt
22.97

RX 6750 XT outperforms RX 580 by a whopping 135% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking24148
Place by popularity1not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation19.8155.01
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2023)
GPU code namePolaris 20Navi 22
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date18 April 2017 (7 years ago)3 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 $549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6750 XT has 178% better value for money than RX 580.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23042560
Core clock speed1257 MHz2150 MHz
Boost clock speed1340 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)185 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate193.0416.0
Floating-point processing power6.175 TFLOPS13.31 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs144160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length241 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s432.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 580 22.97
RX 6750 XT 53.88
+135%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 580 8860
RX 6750 XT 20780
+135%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 580 44344
RX 6750 XT 104004
+135%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 580 19274
RX 6750 XT 48327
+151%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 580 13927
RX 6750 XT 37609
+170%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 580 82516
RX 6750 XT 170993
+107%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 580 348952
RX 6750 XT 529598
+51.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD98
−67.3%
164
+67.3%
1440p42
−121%
93
+121%
4K36
−41.7%
51
+41.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−346%
165
+346%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 58
−93.1%
110−120
+93.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−141%
90−95
+141%
Battlefield 5 138
−23.9%
170−180
+23.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−121%
100−110
+121%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−243%
127
+243%
Far Cry 5 83
−26.5%
100−110
+26.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 83
−56.6%
130−140
+56.6%
Forza Horizon 4 294
+34.2%
210−220
−34.2%
Hitman 3 45−50
−146%
110−120
+146%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
−92.6%
200−210
+92.6%
Metro Exodus 111
−35.1%
150−160
+35.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−85%
110−120
+85%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 122
−73.8%
210−220
+73.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
−45.5%
140−150
+45.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 101
−10.9%
110−120
+10.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−141%
90−95
+141%
Battlefield 5 113
−51.3%
170−180
+51.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−121%
100−110
+121%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−195%
109
+195%
Far Cry 5 69
−52.2%
100−110
+52.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 64
−103%
130−140
+103%
Forza Horizon 4 270
+23.3%
210−220
−23.3%
Hitman 3 45−50
−146%
110−120
+146%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
−92.6%
200−210
+92.6%
Metro Exodus 87
−72.4%
150−160
+72.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−85%
110−120
+85%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
−295%
304
+295%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−124%
110−120
+124%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
−45.5%
140−150
+45.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 34
−229%
110−120
+229%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−141%
90−95
+141%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−121%
100−110
+121%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−165%
98
+165%
Far Cry 5 49
−114%
100−110
+114%
Forza Horizon 4 82
−167%
210−220
+167%
Hitman 3 45−50
−146%
110−120
+146%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
−94.4%
210
+94.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
−238%
260
+238%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
−207%
135
+207%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
+1%
98
−1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−85%
110−120
+85%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−155%
110−120
+155%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−137%
80−85
+137%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−154%
60−65
+154%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−191%
60−65
+191%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−146%
60−65
+146%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−329%
60
+329%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−142%
60−65
+142%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−105%
260−270
+105%
Hitman 3 27−30
−178%
75−80
+178%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−236%
158
+236%
Metro Exodus 53
−138%
126
+138%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−280%
186
+280%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−214%
85−90
+214%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
−69.7%
220−230
+69.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−142%
90−95
+142%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 37
−59.5%
55−60
+59.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 22
−127%
50−55
+127%
Hitman 3 18−20
−150%
45−50
+150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
−79%
210−220
+79%
Metro Exodus 33
−130%
75−80
+130%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27
−193%
79
+193%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18
−122%
40−45
+122%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−217%
35−40
+217%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−420%
26
+420%
Far Cry 5 16
−119%
35−40
+119%
Forza Horizon 4 41
−95.1%
80−85
+95.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−267%
99
+267%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
−310%
41
+310%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−160%
50−55
+160%

This is how RX 580 and RX 6750 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6750 XT is 67% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6750 XT is 121% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6750 XT is 42% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 580 is 34% faster.
  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6750 XT is 420% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 580 is ahead in 3 tests (4%)
  • RX 6750 XT is ahead in 69 tests (96%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.97 53.88
Recency 18 April 2017 3 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 185 Watt 250 Watt

RX 580 has 35.1% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 XT, on the other hand, has a 134.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6750 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 580 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 580
Radeon RX 580
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
Radeon RX 6750 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 18061 vote

Rate Radeon RX 580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 2387 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.