GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile vs Radeon RX 5600 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 5600 XT with GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RX 5600 XT
2020
6 GB GDDR6, 150 Watt
35.12
+90.1%

RX 5600 XT outperforms GTX 1650 Mobile by an impressive 90% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking147309
Place by popularity8051
Cost-effectiveness evaluation53.59no data
Power efficiency16.0825.37
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 10TU117
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date21 January 2020 (5 years ago)15 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041024
Core clock speed1130 MHz1380 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors10,300 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate224.699.84
Floating-point processing power7.188 TFLOPS3.195 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs14464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.140
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 5600 XT 35.12
+90.1%
GTX 1650 Mobile 18.47

  • Other tests
    • Passmark
    • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
    • 3DMark Vantage Performance
    • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
    • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
    • 3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 5600 XT 13530
+90.1%
GTX 1650 Mobile 7116

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 5600 XT 31310
+138%
GTX 1650 Mobile 13132

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 5600 XT 86004
+175%
GTX 1650 Mobile 31311

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 5600 XT 22058
+137%
GTX 1650 Mobile 9313

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 5600 XT 115838
+102%
GTX 1650 Mobile 57365

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 5600 XT 548796
+50.4%
GTX 1650 Mobile 364872

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD110
+86.4%
59
−86.4%
1440p64
+73%
37
−73%
4K38
+58.3%
24
−58.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.54no data
1440p4.36no data
4K7.34no data

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
Atomic Heart 147
+113%
69
−113%
Counter-Strike 2 77
+103%
38
−103%
Cyberpunk 2077 83
+59.6%
52
−59.6%
Atomic Heart 115
+125%
51
−125%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+98.3%
60
−98.3%
Counter-Strike 2 63
+90.9%
33
−90.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 74
+80.5%
41
−80.5%
Far Cry 5 148
+147%
60
−147%
Fortnite 140−150
+56.4%
90−95
−56.4%
Forza Horizon 4 185
+126%
82
−126%
Forza Horizon 5 121
+102%
60
−102%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+102%
65−70
−102%
Valorant 275
+67.7%
164
−67.7%
Atomic Heart 66
+120%
30
−120%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+98.3%
60
−98.3%
Counter-Strike 2 53
+96.3%
27
−96.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+113%
130
−113%
Cyberpunk 2077 63
+96.9%
32
−96.9%
Dota 2 185
+92.7%
96
−92.7%
Far Cry 5 135
+150%
54
−150%
Fortnite 140−150
+56.4%
90−95
−56.4%
Forza Horizon 4 173
+116%
80
−116%
Forza Horizon 5 91
+168%
34
−168%
Grand Theft Auto V 126
+114%
59
−114%
Metro Exodus 81
+145%
33
−145%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+102%
65−70
−102%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140
+126%
62
−126%
Valorant 272
+83.8%
148
−83.8%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+102%
59
−102%
Counter-Strike 2 47
+46.9%
30−35
−46.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+80%
30
−80%
Dota 2 168
+88.8%
89
−88.8%
Far Cry 5 126
+138%
53
−138%
Forza Horizon 4 138
+123%
62
−123%
Forza Horizon 5 85
+118%
39
−118%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+84.5%
71
−84.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 84
+133%
36
−133%
Valorant 148
+10.4%
130−140
−10.4%
Fortnite 140−150
+104%
72
−104%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+100%
14−16
−100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+77.2%
120−130
−77.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 61
+110%
27−30
−110%
Metro Exodus 49
+145%
20
−145%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+5.4%
160−170
−5.4%
Valorant 252
+58.5%
159
−58.5%
Battlefield 5 85−90
+85.1%
47
−85.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+100%
15
−100%
Far Cry 5 89
+154%
35
−154%
Forza Horizon 4 109
+153%
40−45
−153%
Forza Horizon 5 59
+157%
23
−157%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+111%
27−30
−111%
Fortnite 80−85
+88.6%
44
−88.6%
Atomic Heart 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+100%
8−9
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 63
+103%
30−35
−103%
Metro Exodus 30
+150%
12
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+119%
21
−119%
Valorant 214
+138%
90
−138%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+104%
25
−104%
Counter-Strike 2 6
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 12
+140%
5
−140%
Dota 2 99
+120%
45
−120%
Far Cry 5 45
+150%
18
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 70
+133%
30−33
−133%
Forza Horizon 5 30
+131%
13
−131%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+135%
16−18
−135%
Fortnite 40−45
+135%
16−18
−135%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

This is how RX 5600 XT and GTX 1650 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RX 5600 XT is 86% faster in 1080p
  • RX 5600 XT is 73% faster in 1440p
  • RX 5600 XT is 58% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 5, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 5600 XT is 168% faster.
  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1650 Mobile is 33% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 5600 XT is ahead in 65 tests (97%)
  • GTX 1650 Mobile is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.12 18.47
Recency 21 January 2020 15 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 50 Watt

RX 5600 XT has a 90.1% higher aggregate performance score, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 1650 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, and 200% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 5600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5600 XT is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
Radeon RX 5600 XT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3
2983 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4
3427 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 5600 XT or GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.