GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon RX 470 Mobile
Aggregated performance score
Radeon RX 470 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q by 14% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 277 | 302 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 40.96 | 10.44 |
| Architecture | Polaris (2016−2019) | Turing (2018−2021) |
| GPU code name | Polaris 10 Pro | N18P-G62 Max-Q |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 4 August 2016 (7 years ago) | 2 April 2020 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $549.99 | no data |
| Current price | $148 (0.3x MSRP) | $1183 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
RX 470 Mobile has 292% better value for money than GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 926 MHz | 1035 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1206 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 5,700 million | 4,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 137.5 | 76.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,399 gflops | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on Radeon RX 470 Mobile and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | large | medium sized |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 10000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| FreeSync | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.140 |
| CUDA | no data | 7.5 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Radeon RX 470 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q by 14% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Radeon RX 470 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q by 25% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 60−65
+11.1%
| 54
−11.1%
|
| 1440p | 35−40
+0%
| 35
+0%
|
| 4K | 27−30
+12.5%
| 24
−12.5%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−33
+15.4%
|
24−27
−15.4%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 35−40
−25.6%
|
49
+25.6%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 30−35
−15.2%
|
38
+15.2%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65
+12.5%
|
55−60
−12.5%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 45−50
+14%
|
40−45
−14%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−33
+15.4%
|
24−27
−15.4%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 45−50
−14.3%
|
56
+14.3%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 50−55
−9.8%
|
56
+9.8%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 65−70
+12.1%
|
55−60
−12.1%
|
| Hitman 3 | 50−55
+17.4%
|
45−50
−17.4%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 40−45
−25%
|
50
+25%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 30−35
+14.8%
|
27−30
−14.8%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 40−45
−37.5%
|
55
+37.5%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 35−40
−36.1%
|
49
+36.1%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 35−40
−5.1%
|
41
+5.1%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 30−35
+37.5%
|
24
−37.5%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65
+12.5%
|
55−60
−12.5%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 45−50
+14%
|
40−45
−14%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−33
+15.4%
|
24−27
−15.4%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 45−50
−4.1%
|
51
+4.1%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 50−55
−3.9%
|
53
+3.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 65−70
+12.1%
|
55−60
−12.1%
|
| Hitman 3 | 50−55
+17.4%
|
45−50
−17.4%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 40−45
+11.1%
|
36
−11.1%
|
| Metro Exodus | 30−33
−3.3%
|
31
+3.3%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 30−35
+14.8%
|
27−30
−14.8%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 40−45
−7.5%
|
43
+7.5%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 40−45
−31.7%
|
54
+31.7%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 35−40
−8.3%
|
39
+8.3%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 35−40
+105%
|
19
−105%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 30−35
+175%
|
12
−175%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65
+12.5%
|
55−60
−12.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−33
+15.4%
|
24−27
−15.4%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 45−50
+2.1%
|
48
−2.1%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 50−55
+4.1%
|
49
−4.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 65−70
+12.1%
|
55−60
−12.1%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 40−45
+28.1%
|
32
−28.1%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 35−40
+125%
|
16
−125%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 27−30
+16.7%
|
24−27
−16.7%
|
| Hitman 3 | 30−33
+15.4%
|
24−27
−15.4%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 24−27
−20%
|
30
+20%
|
| Metro Exodus | 18−20
+20%
|
14−16
−20%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 14−16
+16.7%
|
12−14
−16.7%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 24−27
+14.3%
|
21−24
−14.3%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 20−22
+17.6%
|
16−18
−17.6%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 16−18
+41.7%
|
12
−41.7%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+13.9%
|
35−40
−13.9%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−12
+22.2%
|
9−10
−22.2%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35
−6.5%
|
33
+6.5%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 35−40
+16.1%
|
30−35
−16.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+15.2%
|
30−35
−15.2%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 20−22
+17.6%
|
16−18
−17.6%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 12−14
−7.7%
|
14
+7.7%
|
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 14−16
+16.7%
|
12−14
−16.7%
|
| Hitman 3 | 16−18
+13.3%
|
14−16
−13.3%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 12−14
+200%
|
4
−200%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−12
+22.2%
|
9−10
−22.2%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 10−11
+11.1%
|
9−10
−11.1%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 12−14
−25%
|
15
+25%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 18−20
−5.3%
|
20
+5.3%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 10−12
+10%
|
10−11
−10%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 10−11
+100%
|
5
−100%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 21−24
+16.7%
|
18−20
−16.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 14−16
−6.7%
|
16
+6.7%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 18−20
+12.5%
|
16−18
−12.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
+17.4%
|
21−24
−17.4%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
This is how RX 470 Mobile and GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q compete in popular games:
- RX 470 Mobile is 11.1% faster than GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q in 1080p
- GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is 0% faster than RX 470 Mobile in 1440p
- RX 470 Mobile is 12.5% faster than GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 470 Mobile is 200% faster than the GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q.
- in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is 37.5% faster than the RX 470 Mobile.
All in all, in popular games:
- RX 470 Mobile is ahead in 48 tests (71%)
- GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is ahead in 20 tests (29%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 18.86 | 16.59 |
| Recency | 4 August 2016 | 2 April 2020 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 35 Watt |
The Radeon RX 470 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
