Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs AMD Radeon RX 470 Mobile
Price now
148$
Games supported
83%
- Interface MXM-B (3.0)
- Core clock speed 926
- Max video memory 8 GB
- Memory type GDDR5
- Memory clock speed 7000
- Maximum resolution
- Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
- Core clock speed 1035
- Max video memory 4 GB
- Memory type GDDR6
- Memory clock speed 10000
- Maximum resolution
Price now
1183$
Games supported
83%
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance rating | 230 | 254 |
| Value for money | 51.14 | 10.30 |
| Architecture | Polaris (2016−2019) | Turing (2018−2021) |
| GPU code name | Polaris 10 Pro | N18P-G62 Max-Q |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 4 August 2016 (6 years old) | 2 April 2020 (2 years old) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $549.99 | no data |
| Current price | $148 (0.3x MSRP) | $1183 |
Value for money
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 926 MHz | 1035 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1206 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 5,700 million | 4,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 137.5 | 76.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,399 gflops | no data |
Dimensions and compatibility
Information on Radeon RX 470 Mobile and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | large | medium sized |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 10000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| FreeSync | + | no data |
API support
APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.140 |
| CUDA | no data | 7.5 |
Benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
- 3DMark Fire Strike Score
- 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
3DMark Fire Strike Score
Benchmark coverage: 13%
Radeon RX 470 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q by 16% in 3DMark Fire Strike Score.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
Radeon RX 470 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q by 25% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | no data | 55 |
| 1440p | no data | 35 |
| 4K | no data | 24 |
Popular games
- Full HD
Low Preset - Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - 1440p
High Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+14.3%
|
27−30
−14.3%
|
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 35−40
−28.9%
|
49
+28.9%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 30−35
−15.2%
|
38
+15.2%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 65−70
+16.1%
|
55−60
−16.1%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 50−55
+16.3%
|
40−45
−16.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+14.3%
|
27−30
−14.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 50−55
−9.8%
|
56
+9.8%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 50−55
−7.7%
|
56
+7.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 65−70
+15.8%
|
55−60
−15.8%
|
| Hitman 3 | 55−60
+19.1%
|
45−50
−19.1%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 40−45
−19%
|
50
+19%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 30−35
+14.3%
|
27−30
−14.3%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 40−45
−34.1%
|
55
+34.1%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 35−40
−36.1%
|
49
+36.1%
|
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 35−40
−7.9%
|
41
+7.9%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 30−35
+37.5%
|
24
−37.5%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 65−70
+16.1%
|
55−60
−16.1%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 50−55
+16.3%
|
40−45
−16.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+14.3%
|
27−30
−14.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 50−55
+0%
|
51
+0%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 50−55
−1.9%
|
53
+1.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 65−70
+15.8%
|
55−60
−15.8%
|
| Hitman 3 | 55−60
+19.1%
|
45−50
−19.1%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 40−45
+16.7%
|
36
−16.7%
|
| Metro Exodus | 30−33
−3.3%
|
31
+3.3%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 30−35
+14.3%
|
27−30
−14.3%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 40−45
−4.9%
|
43
+4.9%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 40−45
−28.6%
|
54
+28.6%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 35−40
−8.3%
|
39
+8.3%
|
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 35−40
+100%
|
19
−100%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 30−35
+175%
|
12
−175%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 65−70
+16.1%
|
55−60
−16.1%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+14.3%
|
27−30
−14.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 50−55
+6.3%
|
48
−6.3%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 50−55
+6.1%
|
49
−6.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 65−70
+15.8%
|
55−60
−15.8%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 40−45
+31.3%
|
32
−31.3%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 35−40
+125%
|
16
−125%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 27−30
+20.8%
|
24−27
−20.8%
|
| Hitman 3 | 30−35
+18.5%
|
27−30
−18.5%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 24−27
−15.4%
|
30
+15.4%
|
| Metro Exodus | 18−20
+20%
|
14−16
−20%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 14−16
+15.4%
|
12−14
−15.4%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 24−27
+14.3%
|
21−24
−14.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
+18.2%
|
10−12
−18.2%
|
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 20−22
+17.6%
|
16−18
−17.6%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 16−18
+41.7%
|
12
−41.7%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+19.4%
|
35−40
−19.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−12
+10%
|
10−11
−10%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35
−3.1%
|
33
+3.1%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 35−40
+16.1%
|
30−35
−16.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+18.8%
|
30−35
−18.8%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 12−14
−7.7%
|
14
+7.7%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 14−16
+16.7%
|
12−14
−16.7%
|
| Hitman 3 | 18−20
+20%
|
14−16
−20%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 12−14
+62.5%
|
8
−62.5%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−11
+25%
|
8−9
−25%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 10−11
+11.1%
|
9−10
−11.1%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 12−14
−25%
|
15
+25%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 18−20
−5.3%
|
20
+5.3%
|
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 10−12
+22.2%
|
9−10
−22.2%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 9−10
+80%
|
5
−80%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 21−24
+22.2%
|
18−20
−22.2%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 14−16
−6.7%
|
16
+6.7%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 18−20
+12.5%
|
16−18
−12.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
+13.6%
|
21−24
−13.6%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 7−8
+16.7%
|
6−7
−16.7%
|
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance rating | 18.69 | 16.08 |
| Recency | 4 August 2016 | 2 April 2020 |
| Memory bus width | 256 | 128 |
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 1024 |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 | 160 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 35 Watt |
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends
since it shows better performance.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Competitors of Radeon RX 470 Mobile by NVIDIA
According to our data, the closest equivalent to Radeon RX 470 Mobile by NVIDIA is GeForce GTX 980M, which is slower by 1% and lower by 2 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon RX 470 Mobile:
Competitors of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q by AMD
According to our data, the closest equivalent to GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q by AMD is Radeon 680M, which is slower by 2% and lower by 5 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q:
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
