NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs AMD Radeon RX 470 Mobile

Buy
VS
Buy
Price now 148$
Games supported 83%
AMD Radeon RX 470 Mobile
Radeon RX 470 Mobile
Buy
  • Interface MXM-B (3.0)
  • Core clock speed 926
  • Max video memory 8 GB
  • Memory type GDDR5
  • Memory clock speed 7000
  • Maximum resolution
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Buy
  • Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
  • Core clock speed 1035
  • Max video memory 4 GB
  • Memory type GDDR6
  • Memory clock speed 10000
  • Maximum resolution
Price now 1183$
Games supported 83%

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rating230254
Value for money51.1410.30
ArchitecturePolaris (2016−2019)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code namePolaris 10 ProN18P-G62 Max-Q
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 August 2016 (6 years old)2 April 2020 (2 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$549.99 no data
Current price$148 (0.3x MSRP)$1183
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

  • 0
  • 50
  • 100
  • 0
  • 50
  • 100

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481024
Core clock speed926 MHz1035 MHz
Boost clock speed1206 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)120 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate137.576.80
Floating-point performance4,399 gflopsno data

Dimensions and compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 470 Mobile and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed7000 MHz10000 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+no data

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.140
CUDAno data7.5

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 470 Mobile 18.69
+16.2%
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 16.08
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Score
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark coverage: 13%

RX 470 Mobile 8961
+16.4%
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 7700

Radeon RX 470 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q by 16% in 3DMark Fire Strike Score.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

RX 470 Mobile 10715
+25.1%
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 8564

Radeon RX 470 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q by 25% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HDno data55
1440pno data35
4Kno data24

Popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+14.3%
27−30
−14.3%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−28.9%
49
+28.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
−15.2%
38
+15.2%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+16.1%
55−60
−16.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+16.3%
40−45
−16.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+14.3%
27−30
−14.3%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−9.8%
56
+9.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−7.7%
56
+7.7%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+15.8%
55−60
−15.8%
Hitman 3 55−60
+19.1%
45−50
−19.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−19%
50
+19%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+14.3%
27−30
−14.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−34.1%
55
+34.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−36.1%
49
+36.1%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−7.9%
41
+7.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+37.5%
24
−37.5%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+16.1%
55−60
−16.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+16.3%
40−45
−16.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+14.3%
27−30
−14.3%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
51
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−1.9%
53
+1.9%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+15.8%
55−60
−15.8%
Hitman 3 55−60
+19.1%
45−50
−19.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+16.7%
36
−16.7%
Metro Exodus 30−33
−3.3%
31
+3.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+14.3%
27−30
−14.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−4.9%
43
+4.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−28.6%
54
+28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−8.3%
39
+8.3%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+100%
19
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+175%
12
−175%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+16.1%
55−60
−16.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+14.3%
27−30
−14.3%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+6.3%
48
−6.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+6.1%
49
−6.1%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+15.8%
55−60
−15.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+31.3%
32
−31.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+125%
16
−125%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
Hitman 3 30−35
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−15.4%
30
+15.4%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+20%
14−16
−20%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+15.4%
12−14
−15.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
+17.6%
16−18
−17.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+41.7%
12
−41.7%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+19.4%
35−40
−19.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−3.1%
33
+3.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+16.1%
30−35
−16.1%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+18.8%
30−35
−18.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−7.7%
14
+7.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Hitman 3 18−20
+20%
14−16
−20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+62.5%
8
−62.5%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−25%
15
+25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−5.3%
20
+5.3%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+80%
5
−80%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−6.7%
16
+6.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+13.6%
21−24
−13.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance rating 18.69 16.08
Recency 4 August 2016 2 April 2020
Memory bus width 256 128
Pipelines / CUDA cores 2048 1024
Memory bandwidth 224 160
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Thermal design power (TDP) 120 Watt 35 Watt

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends

AMD Radeon RX 470 Mobile
Radeon RX 470 Mobile

since it shows better performance.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Competitors of Radeon RX 470 Mobile by NVIDIA

According to our data, the closest equivalent to Radeon RX 470 Mobile by NVIDIA is GeForce GTX 980M, which is slower by 1% and lower by 2 positions in our rating.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M GeForce GTX 980M
Compare

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon RX 470 Mobile:

Competitors of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q by AMD

According to our data, the closest equivalent to GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q by AMD is Radeon 680M, which is slower by 2% and lower by 5 positions in our rating.

AMD Radeon 680M Radeon 680M
Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q:

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 21 vote

Rate AMD Radeon RX 470 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 135 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.