GeForce GTX 680M SLI vs Radeon RX 470 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
460 Mobile 470 Mobile 480 Mobile 490M 540 540X 550 Mobile 550X Mobile 560 Mobile 560X Mobile 580 Mobile 640
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
660M 660M Mac Edition 670M 670MX 670MX SLI 675M 675M SLI 675MX 675MX Mac Edition 680M 680M SLI 680MX 680MX Mac Edition

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 470 Mobile and GeForce GTX 680M SLI, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 470 Mobile
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 85 Watt
16.30
+9.8%

RX 470 Mobile outperforms GTX 680M SLI by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RX 470 Mobile RX 470 Mobile
GTX 680M SLI GTX 680M SLI

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking345369
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.67no data
Power efficiency14.62no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameEllesmereN13E-GTX
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 August 2016 (8 years ago)4 June 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482688
Core clock speed926 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speed1074 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Wattno data
Texture fill rate137.5no data
Floating-point processing power4.399 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs128no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)no data
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2x 4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit2x 256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz3600 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
Optimus-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p140−150
+5.3%
133
−5.3%
Full HD100−110
+2%
98
−2%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.50no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+10.3%
85−90
−10.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+9.4%
30−35
−9.4%
Sons of the Forest 35−40
+12.9%
30−35
−12.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+7.6%
65−70
−7.6%
Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+10.3%
85−90
−10.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+9.4%
30−35
−9.4%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+10%
50−55
−10%
Fortnite 90−95
+7%
85−90
−7%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+9.4%
60−65
−9.4%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+8.3%
45−50
−8.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+10.5%
55−60
−10.5%
Sons of the Forest 35−40
+12.9%
30−35
−12.9%
Valorant 130−140
+6.5%
120−130
−6.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+7.6%
65−70
−7.6%
Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+10.3%
85−90
−10.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
−7%
229
+7%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+9.4%
30−35
−9.4%
Dota 2 100−110
+6.3%
95−100
−6.3%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+10%
50−55
−10%
Fortnite 90−95
+7%
85−90
−7%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+9.4%
60−65
−9.4%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+8.3%
45−50
−8.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+8.6%
55−60
−8.6%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+9.4%
30−35
−9.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+10.5%
55−60
−10.5%
Sons of the Forest 35−40
+12.9%
30−35
−12.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+12.2%
40−45
−12.2%
Valorant 130−140
+6.5%
120−130
−6.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+7.6%
65−70
−7.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+9.4%
30−35
−9.4%
Dota 2 100−110
+6.3%
95−100
−6.3%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+10%
50−55
−10%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+9.4%
60−65
−9.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+10.5%
55−60
−10.5%
Sons of the Forest 35−40
+12.9%
30−35
−12.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+12.2%
40−45
−12.2%
Valorant 130−140
+6.5%
120−130
−6.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 90−95
+7%
85−90
−7%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+8.8%
110−120
−8.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+12%
24−27
−12%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+10.5%
18−20
−10.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+9.6%
140−150
−9.6%
Valorant 160−170
+6.4%
150−160
−6.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+11.6%
40−45
−11.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+8.8%
30−35
−8.8%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+10.5%
35−40
−10.5%
Sons of the Forest 21−24
+10.5%
18−20
−10.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+8.7%
21−24
−8.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+11.8%
30−35
−11.8%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+10.7%
27−30
−10.7%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Valorant 90−95
+10.6%
85−90
−10.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+13.6%
21−24
−13.6%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 55−60
+9.3%
50−55
−9.3%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Sons of the Forest 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%

This is how RX 470 Mobile and GTX 680M SLI compete in popular games:

  • RX 470 Mobile is 5% faster in 900p
  • RX 470 Mobile is 2% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 470 Mobile is 18% faster.
  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 680M SLI is 7% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 470 Mobile is ahead in 63 tests (97%)
  • GTX 680M SLI is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 16.30 14.85
Recency 4 August 2016 4 June 2012
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm

RX 470 Mobile has a 9.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX 470 Mobile and GeForce GTX 680M SLI.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon RX 470 Mobile
Radeon RX 470 Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M SLI
GeForce GTX 680M SLI
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX 470 Mobile Radeon RX 470 Mobile
vs
GTX 1070 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
GTX 680M SLI GeForce GTX 680M SLI
vs
RX 6300M Radeon RX 6300M
RX 470 Mobile Radeon RX 470 Mobile
vs
GTX 1650 Mobile GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Radeon 780M 780M
vs
GTX 1060 Mobile GTX 1060 Mobile
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 3050 6GB Mobile
vs
GTX 1060 Mobile 1060 Mobile
RX 470 RX 470
vs
RX 470 Mobile 470 Mobile
GTX 1050 Ti GTX 1050 Ti
vs
RX 470 Mobile RX 470 Mobile
GTX 780M SLI GTX 780M SLI
vs
RX 470 Mobile RX 470 Mobile
RTX 3000 Mobile RTX 3000 Mobile
vs
RX 470 Mobile RX 470 Mobile
GeForce MX350 MX350
vs
RX 470 Mobile RX 470 Mobile
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
vs
RX 470 Mobile RX 470 Mobile
RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 2050 Mobile
vs
RX 470 Mobile RX 470 Mobile
GeForce MX550 MX550
vs
RX 470 Mobile RX 470 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 32 votes

Rate Radeon RX 470 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 3 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 680M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 470 Mobile or GeForce GTX 680M SLI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.