Arc 8-Cores iGPU vs Radeon R9 295X2

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 295X2 with Arc 8-Cores iGPU, including specs and performance data.

R9 295X2
2014
8 GB GDDR5, 500 Watt
22.31
+23%

R9 295X2 outperforms Arc 8-Cores iGPU by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking231284
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.30no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Xe LPG
GPU code nameVesuviusMeteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 no data
Current price$600 (0.4x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28168
Boost clock speed1018 MHz2300 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)500 Wattno data
Texture fill rate179.2no data
Floating-point performance2x 5,733 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R9 295X2 and Arc 8-Cores iGPU compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportPCIe 2.1 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length307 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2 x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width512 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1250 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth640 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPortno data
Eyefinity1no data
HDMI+no data
DisplayPort support-no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
CrossFire1no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D+no data
LiquidVR1no data
PowerTune-no data
TressFX1no data
TrueAudio-no data
ZeroCore-no data
UVD+no data
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212_2
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan+no data
Mantle-no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 295X2 22.31
+23%
Arc 8-Cores iGPU 18.14

Radeon R9 295X2 outperforms Arc 8-Cores iGPU by 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R9 295X2 21197
+144%
Arc 8-Cores iGPU 8679

Radeon R9 295X2 outperforms Arc 8-Cores iGPU by 144% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45−50
+12.5%
40
−12.5%
1440p18−20
+12.5%
16
−12.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+31.1%
45−50
−31.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%
Far Cry 5 37
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+40%
35−40
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+29.2%
65−70
−29.2%
Hitman 3 35−40
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 33
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+25%
40−45
−25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+28.9%
45−50
−28.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+24.4%
45−50
−24.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+31.1%
45−50
−31.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%
Far Cry 5 35
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+40%
35−40
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+29.2%
65−70
−29.2%
Hitman 3 35−40
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+35.6%
45−50
−35.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+25%
40−45
−25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+28.9%
45−50
−28.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43
+43.3%
30−33
−43.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+24.4%
45−50
−24.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+31.1%
45−50
−31.1%
Far Cry 5 33
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+40%
35−40
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+29.2%
65−70
−29.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 23
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+24.4%
45−50
−24.4%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Hitman 3 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Hitman 3 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%

This is how R9 295X2 and Arc 8-Cores iGPU compete in popular games:

  • R9 295X2 is 13% faster in 1080p
  • R9 295X2 is 13% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.31 18.14
Recency 29 April 2014 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

The Radeon R9 295X2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc 8-Cores iGPU in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 295X2 is a desktop card while Arc 8-Cores iGPU is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 295X2
Radeon R9 295X2
Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU
Arc 8-Cores iGPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 92 votes

Rate Radeon R9 295X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 30 votes

Rate Arc 8-Cores iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.