UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) vs Radeon R9 280

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 280 with UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake), including specs and performance data.

R9 280
2014
3 GB GDDR5, 200 Watt
14.39

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) outperforms R9 280 by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking339319
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.99no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)no data
GPU code nameTahitiRocket Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date4 March 2014 (10 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 no data
Current price$91 (0.3x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792no data
Boost clock speed933 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,313 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate104.5no data
Floating-point performance3,344 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R9 280 and UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length275 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount3 GBno data
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1250 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth240 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPortno data
Eyefinity1no data
HDMI+no data
DisplayPort support-no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
CrossFire1no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D+no data
LiquidVR1no data
PowerTune-no data
TressFX1no data
TrueAudio+no data
ZeroCore-no data
UVD+no data
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan+no data
Mantle-no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 280 14.39
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) 15.70
+9.1%

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) outperforms Radeon R9 280 by 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R9 280 8020
+397%
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) 1613

Radeon R9 280 outperforms UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) by 397% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12−14
−16.7%
14
+16.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−7.8%
55−60
+7.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−8.1%
40−45
+8.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−4.7%
45−50
+4.7%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−8.1%
80−85
+8.1%
Hitman 3 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−5.8%
55−60
+5.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−2.3%
45−50
+2.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14
+0%
14−16
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−7.8%
55−60
+7.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−8.1%
40−45
+8.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−4.7%
45−50
+4.7%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−8.1%
80−85
+8.1%
Hitman 3 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
−3.2%
65−70
+3.2%
Metro Exodus 5
+0%
5−6
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−2.3%
45−50
+2.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−6.1%
35−40
+6.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−8.1%
40−45
+8.1%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−8.1%
80−85
+8.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
−3.2%
65−70
+3.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−2%
50−55
+2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−6.1%
35−40
+6.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−2.3%
45−50
+2.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Hitman 3 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Hitman 3 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how R9 280 and UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is 17% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.39 15.70
Recency 4 March 2014 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 15 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon R9 280 and UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake).

Be aware that Radeon R9 280 is a desktop card while UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 280
Radeon R9 280
Intel UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 379 votes

Rate Radeon R9 280 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 95 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.