Radeon 780M vs R9 295X2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 295X2 with Radeon 780M, including specs and performance data.

R9 295X2
2014
8 GB GDDR5, 500 Watt
22.31
+21.6%

R9 295X2 outperforms Radeon 780M by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking231283
Place by popularitynot in top-10056
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.30no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)RDNA 3
GPU code nameVesuviusPhoenix
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)5 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 no data
Current price$600 (0.4x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2816768
Core clock speedno data1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1018 MHz3000 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)500 Watt54 Watt (35 - 54 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate179.2139.2
Floating-point performance2x 5,733 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R9 295X2 and Radeon 780M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportPCIe 2.1 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length307 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2 x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width512 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth640 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
Eyefinity1no data
HDMI+no data
DisplayPort support-no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
CrossFire1no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D+no data
LiquidVR1no data
PowerTune-no data
TressFX1no data
TrueAudio-no data
ZeroCore-no data
UVD+no data
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan+1.3
Mantle-no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 295X2 22.31
+21.6%
Radeon 780M 18.35

R9 295X2 outperforms 780M by 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 295X2 8617
+21.6%
Radeon 780M 7088

R9 295X2 outperforms 780M by 22% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R9 295X2 21197
+167%
Radeon 780M 7935

R9 295X2 outperforms 780M by 167% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40−45
+11.1%
36
−11.1%
1440p24−27
+14.3%
21
−14.3%
4K16−18
+14.3%
14
−14.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+15.4%
39
−15.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+11.1%
35−40
−11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+12.9%
30−35
−12.9%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+16.7%
60−65
−16.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+8.1%
35−40
−8.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+12.9%
31
−12.9%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+16.3%
40−45
−16.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+12.2%
45−50
−12.2%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
+19%
80−85
−19%
Hitman 3 40−45
+11.1%
35−40
−11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+13.4%
97
−13.4%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+14.8%
60−65
−14.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+17.6%
50−55
−17.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
+17.2%
64
−17.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+9.8%
41
−9.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+11.1%
35−40
−11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+12.9%
30−35
−12.9%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+16.7%
60−65
−16.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+8.1%
35−40
−8.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+12.5%
24
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+16.3%
40−45
−16.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+12.2%
45−50
−12.2%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
+19%
80−85
−19%
Hitman 3 40−45
+11.1%
35−40
−11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+16.4%
70−75
−16.4%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+14.3%
21
−14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+17.6%
50−55
−17.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+13.2%
53
−13.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+19.6%
46
−19.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+16.1%
55−60
−16.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+11.1%
35−40
−11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+12.9%
30−35
−12.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+8.1%
35−40
−8.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+17.4%
23
−17.4%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+16.3%
40−45
−16.3%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
+19%
80−85
−19%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+13.2%
53
−13.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+19.6%
46
−19.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+20.7%
29
−20.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+16.7%
18
−16.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+17.6%
50−55
−17.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+11.1%
35−40
−11.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+10.5%
18−20
−10.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+17.4%
21−24
−17.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+11.1%
27
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+11.1%
35−40
−11.1%
Hitman 3 24−27
+9.1%
21−24
−9.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+8.1%
35−40
−8.1%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+17.6%
30−35
−17.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+9.4%
32
−9.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+20%
20
−20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Hitman 3 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+20%
20−22
−20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+20%
15
−20%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+20%
24−27
−20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+20%
20−22
−20%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+5.9%
16−18
−5.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%

This is how R9 295X2 and Radeon 780M compete in popular games:

  • R9 295X2 is 11% faster in 1080p
  • R9 295X2 is 14% faster in 1440p
  • R9 295X2 is 14% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.31 18.35
Recency 29 April 2014 5 January 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 500 Watt 54 Watt

The Radeon R9 295X2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 780M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 295X2 is a desktop card while Radeon 780M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 295X2
Radeon R9 295X2
AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 92 votes

Rate Radeon R9 295X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1083 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.