Radeon RX 6500 vs R9 280X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

R9 280X
2013
3 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
15.10

RX 6500 outperforms R9 280X by a significant 28% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking331272
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.93no data
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)no data
GPU code nameThaiti XTLno data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date8 October 2013 (10 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data
Current price$11.99 (0x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,313 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Texture fill rate128.0no data
Floating-point performance4,096 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R9 280X and Radeon RX 6500 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length275 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount3 GBno data
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory bandwidth288 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortno data
Eyefinity+no data
HDMI+no data
DisplayPort support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+no data
CrossFire1no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D+no data
LiquidVR1no data
PowerTune-no data
TressFX1no data
TrueAudio+no data
ZeroCore-no data
UVD+no data
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan+no data
Mantle-no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 280X 15.10
RX 6500 19.26
+27.5%

RX 6500 outperforms R9 280X by 28% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 280X 5837
RX 6500 7448
+27.6%

RX 6500 outperforms R9 280X by 28% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD65
−23.1%
80−85
+23.1%
4K34
−17.6%
40−45
+17.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−29.2%
30−35
+29.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
−25.8%
35−40
+25.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−32%
30−35
+32%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−28.6%
60−65
+28.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−27.3%
40−45
+27.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−29.2%
30−35
+29.2%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−19.5%
45−50
+19.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−26.2%
50−55
+26.2%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−23.5%
60−65
+23.5%
Hitman 3 35−40
−31.4%
45−50
+31.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−28.6%
60−65
+28.6%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−19.6%
55−60
+19.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−26.2%
50−55
+26.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−31%
55−60
+31%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−28.6%
35−40
+28.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
−25.8%
35−40
+25.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−32%
30−35
+32%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−28.6%
60−65
+28.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−27.3%
40−45
+27.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−29.2%
30−35
+29.2%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−19.5%
45−50
+19.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−26.2%
50−55
+26.2%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−23.5%
60−65
+23.5%
Hitman 3 35−40
−31.4%
45−50
+31.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−28.6%
60−65
+28.6%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−26.1%
55−60
+26.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−26.2%
50−55
+26.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−31%
55−60
+31%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 48
+17.1%
40−45
−17.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−28.6%
35−40
+28.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
−25.8%
35−40
+25.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−32%
30−35
+32%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−21.2%
40−45
+21.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−29.2%
30−35
+29.2%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−19.5%
45−50
+19.5%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−23.5%
60−65
+23.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−22.4%
60−65
+22.4%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−19.6%
55−60
+19.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
−105%
40−45
+105%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−28.6%
35−40
+28.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−19%
50−55
+19%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−20.7%
35−40
+20.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−25%
35−40
+25%
Hitman 3 21−24
−27.3%
27−30
+27.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−25%
20−22
+25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−41.7%
16−18
+41.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−28%
30−35
+28%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−27.6%
35−40
+27.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
−44.4%
12−14
+44.4%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 30−35
−25%
40−45
+25%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Hitman 3 10−12
−36.4%
14−16
+36.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−44.4%
12−14
+44.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−42.9%
20−22
+42.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−37.5%
21−24
+37.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−30%
24−27
+30%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%

This is how R9 280X and RX 6500 compete in popular games:

  • RX 6500 is 23% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6500 is 18% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the R9 280X is 17% faster than the RX 6500.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6500 is 105% faster than the R9 280X.

All in all, in popular games:

  • R9 280X is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • RX 6500 is ahead in 53 tests (98%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.10 19.26

The Radeon RX 6500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 280X in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 280X is a desktop card while Radeon RX 6500 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 280X
Radeon R9 280X
AMD Radeon RX 6500
Radeon RX 6500

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 623 votes

Rate Radeon R9 280X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 35 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.