Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

Place in the ranking	402	256
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	13.05	24.66
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Polaris 22	TU106
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	24 April 2018 (6 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	2304
Core clock speed	931 MHz	600 MHz
Boost clock speed	1011 MHz	1215 MHz
Number of transistors	5,000 million	10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	60 Watt
Texture fill rate	80.88	175.0
Floating-point processing power	2.588 TFLOPS	5.599 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	64
TMUs	80	144
Tensor Cores	no data	288
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	large
Interface	IGP	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	1024 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	700 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	179.2 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
G-SYNC support	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX Vega M GL 12.38

RTX 3000 Max-Q 21.59
+74.4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX Vega M GL 4768

RTX 3000 Max-Q 8317
+74.4%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Pro WX Vega M GL 10020

RTX 3000 Max-Q 17523
+74.9%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Pro WX Vega M GL 7333

RTX 3000 Max-Q 13617
+85.7%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Pro WX Vega M GL 38986

RTX 3000 Max-Q 66284
+70%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Pro WX Vega M GL 2062

RTX 3000 Max-Q 5048
+145%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	51 −45.1%	74 +45.1%
1440p	24−27 −91.7%	46 +91.7%
4K	15 −113%	32 +113%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

18−20

−78.9%

30−35
+78.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	33 −42.4%	45−50 +42.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −216%	60 +216%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −84.2%	70−75 +84.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −171%	65 +171%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −78.9%	30−35 +78.9%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −78.6%	50−55 +78.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −72.7%	55−60 +72.7%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −62.5%	130−140 +62.5%
Hitman 3	21−24 −283%	88 +283%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 −59.4%	100−110 +59.4%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −85%	70−75 +85%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −133%	77 +133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65 −9.2%	70−75 +9.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −37.7%	95−100 +37.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 −67.9%	45−50 +67.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −163%	50 +163%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −84.2%	70−75 +84.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −146%	59 +146%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −78.9%	30−35 +78.9%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −78.6%	50−55 +78.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −72.7%	55−60 +72.7%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −62.5%	130−140 +62.5%
Hitman 3	21−24 −187%	66 +187%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 −59.4%	100−110 +59.4%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −85%	70−75 +85%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −103%	67 +103%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −82.1%	70−75 +82.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 −56.7%	45−50 +56.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −37.7%	95−100 +37.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	17 −176%	45−50 +176%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −132%	44 +132%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −87.5%	45 +87.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −78.9%	30−35 +78.9%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −78.6%	50−55 +78.6%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −62.5%	130−140 +62.5%
Hitman 3	21−24 −157%	59 +157%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 −59.4%	100−110 +59.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −82.1%	70−75 +82.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24 −117%	52 +117%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 +109%	33 −109%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35

−100%

66
+100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −78.3%	40−45 +78.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −83.3%	30−35 +83.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −83.3%	21−24 +83.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 −150%	20−22 +150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −146%	32 +146%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −117%	12−14 +117%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −78.6%	24−27 +78.6%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −107%	120−130 +107%
Hitman 3	14−16 −66.7%	24−27 +66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −76%	40−45 +76%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −111%	40−45 +111%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −137%	45−50 +137%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −108%	24−27 +108%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 −66.7%	120−130 +66.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

20−22

−135%

47
+135%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 −90.9%	21−24 +90.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 −77.8%	16−18 +77.8%
Hitman 3	8−9 −200%	24 +200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 −98.2%	110−120 +98.2%
Metro Exodus	10−12 −109%	21−24 +109%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	15 −127%	34 +127%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10 −30%	12−14 +30%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −280%	19 +280%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −167%	16 +167%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −100%	12−14 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −81.3%	27−30 +81.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −150%	24−27 +150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −140%	12 +140%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−12

−118%

24
+118%

This is how Pro WX Vega M GL and RTX 3000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

RTX 3000 Max-Q is 45% faster in 1080p
RTX 3000 Max-Q is 92% faster in 1440p
RTX 3000 Max-Q is 113% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro WX Vega M GL is 109% faster.
in Hitman 3, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 3000 Max-Q is 283% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Pro WX Vega M GL is ahead in 1 test (1%)
RTX 3000 Max-Q is ahead in 71 test (99%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	12.38	21.59
Recency	24 April 2018	27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	60 Watt

RTX 3000 Max-Q has a 74.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 8.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.