GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs Radeon Pro WX 4150

Place in performance ranking	531	169
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.46	18.91
Architecture	Polaris (2016−2019)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Polaris 11	N18E-G2 MAX-Q TU106
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	1 March 2017 (7 years ago)	6 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Current price	$2000	$1311

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2070 Max-Q has 4011% better value for money than Pro WX 4150.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	896	2304
Core clock speed	no data	885-1080 MHz
Boost clock speed	1053 MHz	1185-1305 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	80-90 Watt
Texture fill rate	58.97	170.6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro WX 4150 and GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	7000 MHz	12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	384.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
G-SYNC support	no data	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	+	no data
VR Ready	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	no data	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 4150 6.70

RTX 2070 Max-Q 30.35
+353%

GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q outperforms Radeon Pro WX 4150 by 353% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro WX 4150 2587

RTX 2070 Max-Q 11719
+353%

GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q outperforms Radeon Pro WX 4150 by 353% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	21−24 −381%	101 +381%
1440p	12−14 −383%	58 +383%
4K	9−10 −367%	42 +367%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

10−12

no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9	no data
Battlefield 5	18−20	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12	no data
Far Cry 5	14−16	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20	no data
Forza Horizon 4	30−35	no data
Hitman 3	12−14	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35	no data
Metro Exodus	16−18	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30	no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9	no data
Battlefield 5	18−20	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12	no data
Far Cry 5	14−16	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20	no data
Forza Horizon 4	30−35	no data
Hitman 3	12−14	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35	no data
Metro Exodus	16−18	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30	no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12	no data
Far Cry 5	14−16	no data
Forza Horizon 4	30−35	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30	no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11	no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4	no data
Far Cry 5	10−11	no data
Forza Horizon 4	12−14	no data
Hitman 3	10−11	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16	no data
Metro Exodus	7−8	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4	no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14

no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6	no data
Hitman 3	3−4	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	3−4	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4	no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	no data
Far Cry 5	3−4	no data
Forza Horizon 4	7−8	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8	no data
Metro Exodus	8−9	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3	no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8

no data

This is how Pro WX 4150 and RTX 2070 Max-Q compete in popular games:

RTX 2070 Max-Q is 381% faster in 1080p
RTX 2070 Max-Q is 383% faster in 1440p
RTX 2070 Max-Q is 367% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	6.70	30.35
Recency	1 March 2017	6 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	80 Watt