GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs Radeon Pro WX 4150

Place in the ranking	564	193
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	9.63	18.24
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Baffin	TU106
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	1 March 2017 (7 years ago)	29 January 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	896	1920
Core clock speed	1002 MHz	960 MHz
Boost clock speed	1053 MHz	1200 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	115 Watt
Texture fill rate	58.97	144.0
Floating-point processing power	1.887 TFLOPS	4.608 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	48
TMUs	56	120
Tensor Cores	no data	240
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	30

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	336.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
G-SYNC support	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	+	-
VR Ready	no data	+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	-	7.5
DLSS	-	+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	21−24 −395%	104 +395%
1440p	14−16 −371%	66 +371%
4K	9−10 −367%	42 +367%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −354%	55−60 +354%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −350%	60−65 +350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −309%	90 +309%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −354%	55−60 +354%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −121%	31 +121%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −452%	149 +452%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18 −394%	75−80 +394%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −356%	82 +356%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 −400%	100 +400%
Valorant	24−27 −483%	140 +483%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −382%	106 +382%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −354%	55−60 +354%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −71.4%	24 +71.4%
Dota 2	24−27 −313%	99 +313%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −126%	70 +126%
Fortnite	40−45 −251%	140−150 +251%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −356%	123 +356%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18 −394%	75−80 +394%
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 −275%	90 +275%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −239%	61 +239%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 −333%	247 +333%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 −125%	45 +125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −364%	100−110 +364%
Valorant	24−27 −238%	81 +238%
World of Tanks	100−110 −154%	270−280 +154%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −245%	76 +245%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −354%	55−60 +354%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −50%	21 +50%
Dota 2	24−27 −367%	112 +367%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −294%	122 +294%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −296%	107 +296%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18 −394%	75−80 +394%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 −47.4%	84 +47.4%
Valorant	24−27 −413%	123 +413%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	8−9 −575%	50−55 +575%
Grand Theft Auto V	8−9 −575%	50−55 +575%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −361%	170−180 +361%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −383%	29 +383%
World of Tanks	50−55 −294%	190−200 +294%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −408%	61 +408%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −133%	14 +133%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −527%	90−95 +527%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −500%	80−85 +500%
Forza Horizon 5	10−11 −390%	45−50 +390%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −590%	65−70 +590%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −380%	45−50 +380%
Valorant	18−20 −383%	87 +383%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%
Dota 2	18−20 −206%	55−60 +206%
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 −206%	55−60 +206%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −2400%	24−27 +2400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	20−22 −390%	98 +390%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −400%	20 +400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −206%	55−60 +206%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −417%	31 +417%
Counter-Strike 2	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −200%	6 +200%
Dota 2	18−20 −383%	87 +383%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −425%	40−45 +425%
Fortnite	7−8 −457%	39 +457%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −500%	45−50 +500%
Forza Horizon 5	4−5 −575%	27−30 +575%
Valorant	7−8 −486%	41 +486%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2

21−24

+0%

21−24

+0%

This is how Pro WX 4150 and RTX 2060 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 2060 Mobile is 395% faster in 1080p
RTX 2060 Mobile is 371% faster in 1440p
RTX 2060 Mobile is 367% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2060 Mobile is 2400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 2060 Mobile is ahead in 63 tests (98%)
there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	6.71	29.22
Recency	1 March 2017	29 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	115 Watt

Pro WX 4150 has 130% lower power consumption.

RTX 2060 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 335.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 4150 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 4150 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Radeon Pro WX 4150

GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Radeon Pro WX 4150

Quadro K4100M

GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile

GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile

Radeon Pro WX 4150

Quadro M620

RX 580

R9 M395X Mac Edition

UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)

Pro WX 4130

S7100X

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 21 vote

Rate Radeon Pro WX 4150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

4.2 1723 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 4150 or GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.