Quadro K5000M vs Radeon Pro WX 4150

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 4150 and Quadro K5000M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Pro WX 4150
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
6.91

K5000M outperforms Pro WX 4150 by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking558539
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.48
Power efficiency9.545.04
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameBaffinGK104
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date1 March 2017 (7 years ago)7 August 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$329.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8961344
Core clock speed1002 MHz601 MHz
Boost clock speed1053 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,000 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate58.9767.31
Floating-point processing power1.887 TFLOPS1.615 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs56112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz750 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.131+
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 4150 6.91
K5000M 7.30
+5.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 4150 2658
K5000M 2806
+5.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50−55
−8%
54
+8%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data6.11

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Elden Ring 18−20
−11.1%
20−22
+11.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−4.5%
21−24
+4.5%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−3.6%
27−30
+3.6%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−5.6%
18−20
+5.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Valorant 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−4.5%
21−24
+4.5%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Dota 2 24−27
−4.2%
24−27
+4.2%
Elden Ring 18−20
−11.1%
20−22
+11.1%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−3.2%
30−35
+3.2%
Fortnite 40−45
−4.9%
40−45
+4.9%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−3.6%
27−30
+3.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−4.2%
24−27
+4.2%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−5.6%
18−20
+5.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−5.4%
55−60
+5.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−4.8%
21−24
+4.8%
Valorant 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
World of Tanks 100−110
−4.7%
110−120
+4.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−4.5%
21−24
+4.5%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Dota 2 24−27
−4.2%
24−27
+4.2%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−3.2%
30−35
+3.2%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−3.6%
27−30
+3.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−5.4%
55−60
+5.4%
Valorant 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Elden Ring 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−2.6%
35−40
+2.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
World of Tanks 50−55
−6%
50−55
+6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Valorant 18−20
−5.6%
18−20
+5.6%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Elden Ring 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Valorant 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

This is how Pro WX 4150 and K5000M compete in popular games:

  • K5000M is 8% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the K5000M is 50% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • K5000M is ahead in 42 tests (67%)
  • there's a draw in 21 test (33%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.91 7.30
Recency 1 March 2017 7 August 2012
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 100 Watt

Pro WX 4150 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

K5000M, on the other hand, has a 5.6% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro WX 4150 and Quadro K5000M.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150
Radeon Pro WX 4150
NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
Quadro K5000M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 21 vote

Rate Radeon Pro WX 4150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 87 votes

Rate Quadro K5000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.