GeForce RTX 2060 vs Radeon Pro WX 4150

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 4150 with GeForce RTX 2060, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 4150
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
6.78

RTX 2060 outperforms Pro WX 4150 by a whopping 441% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking558129
Place by popularitynot in top-10020
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data40.81
Power efficiency9.4615.99
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameBaffinTU106
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 March 2017 (7 years ago)7 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8961920
Core clock speed1002 MHz1365 MHz
Boost clock speed1053 MHz1680 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate58.97201.6
Floating-point processing power1.887 TFLOPS6.451 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs56120
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data30

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s336.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 4150 6.78
RTX 2060 36.68
+441%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 4150 2615
RTX 2060 14151
+441%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21−24
−462%
118
+462%
1440p12−14
−500%
72
+500%
4K9−10
−444%
49
+444%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.96
1440pno data4.85
4Kno data7.12

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−473%
60−65
+473%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−441%
92
+441%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−778%
79
+778%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−726%
157
+726%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−657%
106
+657%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−473%
60−65
+473%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−660%
114
+660%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−574%
128
+574%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−356%
205
+356%
Hitman 3 12−14
−654%
98
+654%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−520%
248
+520%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−658%
144
+658%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−474%
109
+474%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−730%
191
+730%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−379%
254
+379%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−671%
131
+671%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−611%
64
+611%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−637%
140
+637%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−586%
96
+586%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−473%
60−65
+473%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−507%
91
+507%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−400%
95
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−331%
194
+331%
Hitman 3 12−14
−638%
96
+638%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−518%
247
+518%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−637%
140
+637%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−442%
103
+442%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−474%
130−140
+474%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−262%
75−80
+262%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−360%
244
+360%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−229%
56
+229%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−511%
55
+511%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−407%
71
+407%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−473%
60−65
+473%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−367%
70
+367%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−133%
105
+133%
Hitman 3 12−14
−523%
81
+523%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−200%
120
+200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−474%
130−140
+474%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−248%
73
+248%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+17.8%
45
−17.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−405%
96
+405%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−438%
70−75
+438%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−460%
55−60
+460%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−550%
35−40
+550%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−2000%
42
+2000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−750%
51
+750%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−833%
27−30
+833%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−425%
40−45
+425%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−804%
200−210
+804%
Hitman 3 10−11
−440%
54
+440%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−493%
89
+493%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−986%
76
+986%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−2075%
85−90
+2075%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−767%
50−55
+767%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−449%
236
+449%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−517%
74
+517%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−567%
40
+567%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−640%
37
+640%
Hitman 3 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−420%
104
+420%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−1200%
52
+1200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−1600%
51
+1600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−600%
28
+600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−700%
24
+700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−833%
28
+833%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−733%
25
+733%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−743%
59
+743%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
−4800%
45−50
+4800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−750%
17
+750%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−443%
38
+443%

This is how Pro WX 4150 and RTX 2060 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2060 is 462% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2060 is 500% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2060 is 444% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro WX 4150 is 18% faster.
  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 2060 is 4800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro WX 4150 is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • RTX 2060 is ahead in 71 test (99%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.78 36.68
Recency 1 March 2017 7 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 160 Watt

Pro WX 4150 has 220% lower power consumption.

RTX 2060, on the other hand, has a 441% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2060 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 4150 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 4150 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 2060 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150
Radeon Pro WX 4150
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 19 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 4150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 10213 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.