NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

Pro WX 4150
6.34

GeForce GTX 1660 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 4150 by 376% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking540170
Place by popularitynot in top-10048
Value for money0.4725.03
ArchitecturePolaris (2016−2019)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code namePolaris 11Turing TU116
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 March 2017 (7 years old)14 March 2019 (5 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$219
Current price$2000 $252 (1.2x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1660 has 5226% better value for money than Pro WX 4150.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8961408
Core clock speedno data1530 MHz
Boost clock speed1053 MHz1785 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate58.97157.1

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro WX 4150 and GeForce GTX 1660 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed7000 MHz8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s192.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDAno data7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 4150 6.34
GTX 1660 30.16
+376%

GeForce GTX 1660 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 4150 by 376% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro WX 4150 2457
GTX 1660 11692
+376%

GeForce GTX 1660 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 4150 by 376% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18−20
−378%
86
+378%
1440p10−12
−380%
48
+380%
4K5−6
−460%
28
+460%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−610%
71
+610%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−338%
55−60
+338%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−743%
59
+743%
Battlefield 5 20−22
−370%
90−95
+370%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−489%
112
+489%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−480%
58
+480%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−614%
100
+614%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−533%
95
+533%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−529%
132
+529%
Hitman 3 14−16
−633%
110
+633%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−583%
82
+583%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−564%
73
+564%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−520%
93
+520%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
−680%
78
+680%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−338%
55−60
+338%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−500%
42
+500%
Battlefield 5 20−22
−370%
90−95
+370%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−347%
85
+347%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−370%
47
+370%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−557%
92
+557%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−493%
89
+493%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−486%
123
+486%
Hitman 3 14−16
−500%
90
+500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−408%
61
+408%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−533%
57
+533%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−264%
40
+264%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−420%
78
+420%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−685%
102
+685%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
−560%
66
+560%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−338%
55−60
+338%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−429%
37
+429%
Battlefield 5 20−22
−370%
90−95
+370%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−300%
40
+300%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−514%
86
+514%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−447%
82
+447%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−367%
98
+367%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−338%
57
+338%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
−190%
29
+190%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−470%
57
+470%
Hitman 3 10−11
−470%
57
+470%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−208%
40
+208%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−725%
33
+725%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−525%
25
+525%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−433%
48
+433%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−560%
30−35
+560%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2600%
27
+2600%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−1220%
65−70
+1220%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−700%
24
+700%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−490%
59
+490%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−638%
59
+638%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−660%
76
+660%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−550%
35−40
+550%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−850%
19
+850%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−700%
32
+700%
Hitman 3 6−7
−417%
31
+417%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−37.5%
11
+37.5%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−1900%
20
+1900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−1100%
24
+1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−1067%
35
+1067%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−567%
20−22
+567%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−400%
15
+400%
Battlefield 5 2−3
−1700%
35−40
+1700%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10
+900%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−400%
30
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−288%
31
+288%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−733%
50
+733%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−1100%
12
+1100%

This is how Pro WX 4150 and GTX 1660 compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • GTX 1660 is 378% faster than Pro WX 4150

1440p resolution:

  • GTX 1660 is 380% faster than Pro WX 4150

4K resolution:

  • GTX 1660 is 460% faster than Pro WX 4150

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1660 is 2600% faster than the Pro WX 4150.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 1660 surpassed Pro WX 4150 in all 68 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 6.34 30.16
Recency 1 March 2017 14 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 120 Watt

The GeForce GTX 1660 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 4150 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 4150 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 1660 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150
Radeon Pro WX 4150
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 17 votes

Rate AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 4591 vote

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.