Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary vs Pro WX 3200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 3200 with Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 3200
2019
4 GB GDDR5, 65 Watt
6.26

RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary outperforms Pro WX 3200 by a whopping 586% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking57888
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.4141.88
Power efficiency6.6113.10
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code namePolaris 23Navi 10
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date2 July 2019 (5 years ago)7 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 $449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary has 237% better value for money than Pro WX 3200.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6402560
Core clock speed1082 MHz1680 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1980 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate34.62316.8
Floating-point processing power1.385 TFLOPS10.14 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs32160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
WidthMXM Module2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 3200 6.26
RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary 42.94
+586%

  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 3200 2414
RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary 16549
+586%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD20
−550%
130−140
+550%
4K8
−525%
50−55
+525%

Cost per frame, $

1080p9.953.45
4K24.888.98

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−550%
65−70
+550%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−525%
100−105
+525%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−525%
50−55
+525%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−567%
120−130
+567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−554%
85−90
+554%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−550%
65−70
+550%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−579%
95−100
+579%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−567%
120−130
+567%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−583%
280−290
+583%
Hitman 3 12−14
−554%
85−90
+554%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−584%
260−270
+584%
Metro Exodus 24
−567%
160−170
+567%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−547%
110−120
+547%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−582%
150−160
+582%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−488%
300−310
+488%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−525%
100−105
+525%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−525%
50−55
+525%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−567%
120−130
+567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−554%
85−90
+554%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−550%
65−70
+550%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−579%
95−100
+579%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−567%
120−130
+567%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−583%
280−290
+583%
Hitman 3 12−14
−554%
85−90
+554%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−584%
260−270
+584%
Metro Exodus 14
−579%
95−100
+579%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−547%
110−120
+547%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−582%
150−160
+582%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−550%
130−140
+550%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−488%
300−310
+488%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−525%
100−105
+525%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−525%
50−55
+525%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−554%
85−90
+554%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−550%
65−70
+550%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−579%
95−100
+579%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−583%
280−290
+583%
Hitman 3 12−14
−554%
85−90
+554%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−584%
260−270
+584%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−582%
150−160
+582%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
−550%
65−70
+550%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−488%
300−310
+488%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−547%
110−120
+547%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−567%
80−85
+567%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−550%
65−70
+550%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−543%
45−50
+543%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−550%
130−140
+550%
Hitman 3 10−11
−550%
65−70
+550%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−579%
95−100
+579%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−575%
270−280
+575%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−582%
75−80
+582%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
Hitman 3 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−547%
110−120
+547%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
−500%
30−33
+500%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−543%
45−50
+543%

This is how Pro WX 3200 and RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary compete in popular games:

  • RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary is 550% faster in 1080p
  • RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary is 525% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.26 42.94
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 225 Watt

Pro WX 3200 has 246.2% lower power consumption.

RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary, on the other hand, has a 585.9% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 3200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
Radeon Pro WX 3200
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary
Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3
83 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3
131 vote

Rate Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.