RTX A4500 Mobile vs Radeon Pro W6800

Place in the ranking	51	78
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	24.60	no data
Power efficiency	14.24	22.17
Architecture	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Navi 21	GA104
Market segment	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	8 June 2021 (3 years ago)	22 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,249	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3840	5888
Core clock speed	2075 MHz	930 MHz
Boost clock speed	2320 MHz	1500 MHz
Number of transistors	26,800 million	17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	140 Watt
Texture fill rate	556.8	276.0
Floating-point processing power	17.82 TFLOPS	17.66 TFLOPS
ROPs	96	96
TMUs	240	184
Tensor Cores	no data	184
Ray Tracing Cores	60	46

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	512.0 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

6x mini-DisplayPort

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	3.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	-	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro W6800 51.58
+14.6%

RTX A4500 Mobile 44.99

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro W6800 19832
+14.6%

RTX A4500 Mobile 17300

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	157 +20.8%	130−140 −20.8%
1440p	120 +20%	100−110 −20%
4K	93 +16.3%	80−85 −16.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	14.32	no data
1440p	18.74	no data
4K	24.18	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	110−120 +18.4%	95−100 −18.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	110−120 +17.3%	95−100 −17.3%
Elden Ring	180−190 +17.4%	160−170 −17.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +4.5%	110−120 −4.5%
Counter-Strike 2	110−120 +18.4%	95−100 −18.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	110−120 +17.3%	95−100 −17.3%
Forza Horizon 4	282 +24.8%	220−230 −24.8%
Metro Exodus	61 −70.5%	100−110 +70.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	95−100 +11.6%	85−90 −11.6%
Valorant	210−220 +19.1%	180−190 −19.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +4.5%	110−120 −4.5%
Counter-Strike 2	110−120 +18.4%	95−100 −18.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	110−120 +17.3%	95−100 −17.3%
Dota 2	114 −17.5%	130−140 +17.5%
Elden Ring	180−190 +17.4%	160−170 −17.4%
Far Cry 5	45 −129%	100−110 +129%
Fortnite	200−210 +10.6%	180−190 −10.6%
Forza Horizon 4	277 +22.6%	220−230 −22.6%
Grand Theft Auto V	121 −10.7%	130−140 +10.7%
Metro Exodus	116 +11.5%	100−110 −11.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +2.4%	210−220 −2.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	95−100 +11.6%	85−90 −11.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 +6.1%	160−170 −6.1%
Valorant	210−220 +19.1%	180−190 −19.1%
World of Tanks	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +4.5%	110−120 −4.5%
Counter-Strike 2	110−120 +18.4%	95−100 −18.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	110−120 +17.3%	95−100 −17.3%
Dota 2	86 −55.8%	130−140 +55.8%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +6.8%	100−110 −6.8%
Forza Horizon 4	268 +18.6%	220−230 −18.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +2.4%	210−220 −2.4%
Valorant	210−220 +19.1%	180−190 −19.1%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	88 +3.5%	85−90 −3.5%
Elden Ring	110−120 +20.6%	95−100 −20.6%
Grand Theft Auto V	88 +3.5%	85−90 −3.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 +21.7%	45−50 −21.7%
World of Tanks	300−350 +15.8%	280−290 −15.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +6.3%	75−80 −6.3%
Counter-Strike 2	55−60 +22.9%	45−50 −22.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +22.9%	45−50 −22.9%
Far Cry 5	150−160 +10.4%	140−150 −10.4%
Forza Horizon 4	212 +57%	130−140 −57%
Metro Exodus	55 −70.9%	90−95 +70.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−110 +21.7%	80−85 −21.7%
Valorant	180−190 +23.3%	150−160 −23.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	55−60 +20.8%	45−50 −20.8%
Dota 2	125 +35.9%	90−95 −35.9%
Elden Ring	55−60 +23.4%	45−50 −23.4%
Grand Theft Auto V	125 +35.9%	90−95 −35.9%
Metro Exodus	55 +41%	35−40 −41%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +18%	150−160 −18%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +23.3%	30−33 −23.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	125 +35.9%	90−95 −35.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +18.5%	50−55 −18.5%
Counter-Strike 2	55−60 +20.8%	45−50 −20.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +22.7%	21−24 −22.7%
Dota 2	94 +2.2%	90−95 −2.2%
Far Cry 5	85−90 +24.3%	70−75 −24.3%
Fortnite	80−85 +22.1%	65−70 −22.1%
Forza Horizon 4	126 +63.6%	75−80 −63.6%
Valorant	100−110 +25.9%	80−85 −25.9%

This is how Pro W6800 and RTX A4500 Mobile compete in popular games:

Pro W6800 is 21% faster in 1080p
Pro W6800 is 20% faster in 1440p
Pro W6800 is 16% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro W6800 is 64% faster.
in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX A4500 Mobile is 129% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Pro W6800 is ahead in 55 tests (87%)
RTX A4500 Mobile is ahead in 6 tests (10%)
there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	51.58	44.99
Recency	8 June 2021	22 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	140 Watt