GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB vs Radeon Pro W6800

Place in performance ranking	47	91
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	19.26	23.81
Architecture	Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Navi 21	TU106
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	8 June 2021 (2 years ago)	7 December 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,249	no data
Current price	$1990 (0.9x MSRP)	$530

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2060 12 GB has 24% better value for money than Pro W6800.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3840	2176
Core clock speed	2075 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2320 MHz	1650 MHz
Number of transistors	26,800 million	10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	184 Watt
Texture fill rate	556.8	224.4

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	229 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 8-pin

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	16000 MHz	14 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	512.0 GB/s	336.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	6x mini-DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	no data	+

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	3.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	no data	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro W6800 51.57
+25.7%

RTX 2060 12 GB 41.04

Radeon Pro W6800 outperforms GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB by 26% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro W6800 19962
+25.7%

RTX 2060 12 GB 15886

Radeon Pro W6800 outperforms GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB by 26% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	137 +37%	100−110 −37%
1440p	125 +31.6%	95−100 −31.6%
4K	84 +29.2%	65−70 −29.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

95−100
+28%

75−80

−28%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	80−85 +29.2%	65−70 −29.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	85−90 +27.1%	70−75 −27.1%
Battlefield 5	130−140 +35%	100−105 −35%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	140−150 +27.3%	110−120 −27.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	95−100 +28%	75−80 −28%
Far Cry 5	70 +27.3%	55−60 −27.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	61 +35.6%	45−50 −35.6%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +35.5%	110−120 −35.5%
Hitman 3	160−170 +26.9%	130−140 −26.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +31.8%	85−90 −31.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85 +29.2%	65−70 −29.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	130−140 +34%	100−105 −34%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 +31.4%	70−75 −31.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	80−85 +29.2%	65−70 −29.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	85−90 +27.1%	70−75 −27.1%
Battlefield 5	130−140 +35%	100−105 −35%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	140−150 +27.3%	110−120 −27.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	95−100 +28%	75−80 −28%
Far Cry 5	65 +30%	50−55 −30%
Far Cry New Dawn	59 +31.1%	45−50 −31.1%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +35.5%	110−120 −35.5%
Hitman 3	160−170 +26.9%	130−140 −26.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +31.8%	85−90 −31.8%
Metro Exodus	160 +33.3%	120−130 −33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85 +29.2%	65−70 −29.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	130−140 +34%	100−105 −34%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	199 +32.7%	150−160 −32.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 +31.4%	70−75 −31.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	80−85 +29.2%	65−70 −29.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	85−90 +27.1%	70−75 −27.1%
Battlefield 5	130−140 +35%	100−105 −35%
Cyberpunk 2077	95−100 +28%	75−80 −28%
Far Cry 5	62 +37.8%	45−50 −37.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	55 +37.5%	40−45 −37.5%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +35.5%	110−120 −35.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	157 +30.8%	120−130 −30.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 +31.4%	70−75 −31.4%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	90−95 +28.6%	70−75 −28.6%
Hitman 3	100−110 +30%	80−85 −30%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80 +30%	60−65 −30%
Metro Exodus	171 +31.5%	130−140 −31.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +25.7%	35−40 −25.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	85−90 +32.3%	65−70 −32.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +40%	40−45 −40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 +33.3%	45−50 −33.3%
Battlefield 5	100−110 +26.3%	80−85 −26.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +34.3%	35−40 −34.3%
Far Cry 5	64 +28%	50−55 −28%
Far Cry New Dawn	55 +37.5%	40−45 −37.5%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +31.8%	85−90 −31.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	80−85 +29.2%	65−70 −29.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +27.5%	40−45 −27.5%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +30%	40−45 −30%
Hitman 3	55−60 +40%	40−45 −40%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 +34.3%	35−40 −34.3%
Metro Exodus	55 +37.5%	40−45 −37.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 +38.1%	21−24 −38.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +28.6%	35−40 −28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	99 +32%	75−80 −32%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +37%	27−30 −37%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +33.3%	27−30 −33.3%
Battlefield 5	60−65 +28%	50−55 −28%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +31.3%	16−18 −31.3%
Far Cry 5	60 +33.3%	45−50 −33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	55 +37.5%	40−45 −37.5%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +36.4%	55−60 −36.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 +38.1%	21−24 −38.1%

This is how Pro W6800 and RTX 2060 12 GB compete in popular games:

Pro W6800 is 37% faster than RTX 2060 12 GB in 1080p
Pro W6800 is 31.6% faster than RTX 2060 12 GB in 1440p
Pro W6800 is 29.2% faster than RTX 2060 12 GB in 4K

Pros & Cons Summary

Performance score	51.57	41.04
Recency	8 June 2021	7 December 2021
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	184 Watt