Radeon RX 6750 XT vs Pro W6800

Place in the ranking	51	47
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	24.60	51.88
Power efficiency	14.24	14.92
Architecture	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Navi 21	Navi 22
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	8 June 2021 (3 years ago)	3 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,249	$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6750 XT has 111% better value for money than Pro W6800.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3840	2560
Core clock speed	2075 MHz	2150 MHz
Boost clock speed	2320 MHz	2600 MHz
Number of transistors	26,800 million	17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	556.8	416.0
Floating-point processing power	17.82 TFLOPS	13.31 TFLOPS
ROPs	96	64
TMUs	240	160
Ray Tracing Cores	60	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	512.0 GB/s	432.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	6x mini-DisplayPort	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	2.1
Vulkan	1.2	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro W6800 51.58

RX 6750 XT 54.05
+4.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro W6800 19832

RX 6750 XT 20783
+4.8%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Pro W6800 44404

RX 6750 XT 48327
+8.8%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Pro W6800 82458

RX 6750 XT 104004
+26.1%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Pro W6800 27937

RX 6750 XT 37609
+34.6%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Pro W6800 92363

RX 6750 XT 170993
+85.1%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Pro W6800 440592

RX 6750 XT 529598
+20.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	157 −5.1%	165 +5.1%
1440p	120 +37.9%	87 −37.9%
4K	93 +82.4%	51 −82.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	14.32 −331%	3.33 +331%
1440p	18.74 −197%	6.31 +197%
4K	24.18 −125%	10.76 +125%

RX 6750 XT has 331% lower cost per frame in 1080p
RX 6750 XT has 197% lower cost per frame in 1440p
RX 6750 XT has 125% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	110−120 −43.1%	166 +43.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	110−120 −43.5%	165 +43.5%
Elden Ring	180−190 −4.2%	197 +4.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 −0.9%	110−120 +0.9%
Counter-Strike 2	110−120 −12.1%	130 +12.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	110−120 +79.7%	64 −79.7%
Forza Horizon 4	282 −30.5%	368 +30.5%
Metro Exodus	61 −146%	150 +146%
Red Dead Redemption 2	95−100 −4.2%	100−105 +4.2%
Valorant	210−220 −6.4%	230−240 +6.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 −0.9%	110−120 +0.9%
Counter-Strike 2	110−120 +6.4%	109 −6.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	110−120 +113%	54 −113%
Dota 2	114 −39.5%	159 +39.5%
Elden Ring	180−190 +186%	66 −186%
Far Cry 5	45 −8.9%	49 +8.9%
Fortnite	200−210 −3.8%	210−220 +3.8%
Forza Horizon 4	277 −9.7%	304 +9.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	121 −33.9%	162 +33.9%
Metro Exodus	116 −3.4%	120 +3.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	95−100 −4.2%	100−105 +4.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Valorant	210−220 −6.4%	230−240 +6.4%
World of Tanks	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 −0.9%	110−120 +0.9%
Counter-Strike 2	110−120 +20.8%	96 −20.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	110−120 +135%	49 −135%
Dota 2	86 −52.3%	131 +52.3%
Far Cry 5	110−120 −2.7%	110−120 +2.7%
Forza Horizon 4	268 +3.1%	260 −3.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%
Valorant	210−220 −6.4%	230−240 +6.4%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	88 −20.5%	106 +20.5%
Elden Ring	110−120 −7.7%	126 +7.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	88 −20.5%	106 +20.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 −7.1%	60−65 +7.1%
World of Tanks	300−350 −5.5%	300−350 +5.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 −1.2%	85−90 +1.2%
Counter-Strike 2	55−60 +3.5%	57 −3.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +96.7%	30 −96.7%
Far Cry 5	150−160 −0.6%	160−170 +0.6%
Forza Horizon 4	212 +14%	186 −14%
Metro Exodus	55 −129%	126 +129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−110 −6.9%	100−110 +6.9%
Valorant	180−190 −7.6%	190−200 +7.6%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	55−60 +75.8%	33 −75.8%
Dota 2	125 +20.2%	104 −20.2%
Elden Ring	55−60 −1.7%	59 +1.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	125 +20.2%	104 −20.2%
Metro Exodus	55 +17%	47 −17%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 −6.2%	180−190 +6.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −5.4%	35−40 +5.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	125 +20.2%	104 −20.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 −6.3%	65−70 +6.3%
Counter-Strike 2	55−60 −5.2%	60−65 +5.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +108%	13 −108%
Dota 2	94 −7.4%	101 +7.4%
Far Cry 5	85−90 −8%	90−95 +8%
Fortnite	80−85 −8.4%	90−95 +8.4%
Forza Horizon 4	126 +27.3%	99 −27.3%
Valorant	100−110 −8.8%	110−120 +8.8%

This is how Pro W6800 and RX 6750 XT compete in popular games:

RX 6750 XT is 5% faster in 1080p
Pro W6800 is 38% faster in 1440p
Pro W6800 is 82% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Elden Ring, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Pro W6800 is 186% faster.
in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 6750 XT is 146% faster.

All in all, in popular games: