GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs Radeon Pro W6800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pro W6800
2021
32 GB GDDR6, 250 Watt
51.18
+22.2%

Radeon Pro W6800 outperforms GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile by a significant 22% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking4881
Place by popularitynot in top-10054
Cost-effectiveness evaluation19.43no data
ArchitectureNavi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)Ada Lovelace
GPU code nameNavi 21GN21-X4
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date8 June 2021 (2 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,249 no data
Current price$1990 (0.9x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38403072
Core clock speed2075 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2320 MHz2370 MHz
Number of transistors26,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate556.8181.4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro W6800 and GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed16000 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDAno data8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro W6800 51.18
+22.2%
RTX 4060 Mobile 41.89

Radeon Pro W6800 outperforms GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile by 22% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Pro W6800 44404
+24.4%
RTX 4060 Mobile 35704

Radeon Pro W6800 outperforms GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile by 24% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Pro W6800 82458
RTX 4060 Mobile 90275
+9.5%

GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile outperforms Radeon Pro W6800 by 9% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Pro W6800 27937
+5.6%
RTX 4060 Mobile 26454

Radeon Pro W6800 outperforms GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile by 6% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Pro W6800 92363
RTX 4060 Mobile 152642
+65.3%

GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile outperforms Radeon Pro W6800 by 65% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

Pro W6800 440592
RTX 4060 Mobile 598142
+35.8%

GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile outperforms Radeon Pro W6800 by 36% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD139
+20.9%
115
−20.9%
1440p135
+121%
61
−121%
4K88
+110%
42
−110%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
−32.6%
126
+32.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
+16.7%
70−75
−16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 85−90
−53.4%
135
+53.4%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+21.6%
130−140
−21.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
+20.4%
90−95
−20.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
−5.3%
100
+5.3%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+12%
80−85
−12%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
+14.6%
100−110
−14.6%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+19.8%
120−130
−19.8%
Hitman 3 120−130
−58.4%
198
+58.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 283
+76.9%
160−170
−76.9%
Metro Exodus 110−120
+11.4%
100−110
−11.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+12.1%
95−100
−12.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 282
+5.6%
267
−5.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+19.5%
75−80
−19.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
+16.7%
70−75
−16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 85−90
−29.5%
114
+29.5%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+21.6%
130−140
−21.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
+20.4%
90−95
−20.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+11.8%
85
−11.8%
Far Cry 5 45
−136%
106
+136%
Far Cry New Dawn 30
−243%
100−110
+243%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+19.8%
120−130
−19.8%
Hitman 3 120−130
+112%
59
−112%
Horizon Zero Dawn 200−210
+28.8%
160−170
−28.8%
Metro Exodus 59
−78%
100−110
+78%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+12.1%
95−100
−12.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 139
−26.6%
176
+26.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 199
+4.2%
191
−4.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+19.5%
75−80
−19.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
+16.7%
70−75
−16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 85−90
−11.4%
98
+11.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
+20.4%
90−95
−20.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+23.4%
77
−23.4%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+12%
80−85
−12%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+19.8%
120−130
−19.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 225
+40.6%
160−170
−40.6%
Metro Exodus 55
−90.9%
100−110
+90.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 157
+55.4%
101
−55.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+41.5%
65
−41.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+12.1%
95−100
−12.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+29.6%
80−85
−29.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130
+22.4%
95−100
−22.4%
Hitman 3 60−65
+18.5%
50−55
−18.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+29.4%
30−35
−29.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+21.7%
45−50
−21.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
−20%
72
+20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+24.6%
65−70
−24.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−4.3%
49
+4.3%
Far Cry 5 64
−54.7%
99
+54.7%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+27%
85−90
−27%
Horizon Zero Dawn 179
+94.6%
90−95
−94.6%
Metro Exodus 55
−41.8%
75−80
+41.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 212
+66.9%
127
−66.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+7.9%
76
−7.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+15.9%
44
−15.9%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 45
−124%
101
+124%
Far Cry New Dawn 70−75
+29.1%
55−60
−29.1%
Hitman 3 40−45
+26.5%
30−35
−26.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+29.6%
50−55
−29.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−52.3%
67
+52.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 99
+73.7%
57
−73.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+27.6%
27−30
−27.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+23.5%
50−55
−23.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+29.3%
40−45
−29.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+10.5%
19
−10.5%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+27.1%
55−60
−27.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 109
+102%
50−55
−102%
Metro Exodus 55
+25%
40−45
−25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+16%
25
−16%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+26.3%
35−40
−26.3%

This is how Pro W6800 and RTX 4060 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Pro W6800 is 21% faster in 1080p
  • Pro W6800 is 121% faster in 1440p
  • Pro W6800 is 110% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Hitman 3, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Pro W6800 is 112% faster than the RTX 4060 Mobile.
  • in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4060 Mobile is 243% faster than the Pro W6800.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro W6800 is ahead in 55 tests (76%)
  • RTX 4060 Mobile is ahead in 17 tests (24%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 51.18 41.89
Recency 8 June 2021 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 115 Watt

The Radeon Pro W6800 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W6800 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W6800
Radeon Pro W6800
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 79 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 2277 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.