GeForce 210 vs Radeon Pro Vega 64

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	146	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.13	no data
Architecture	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code name	Vega 10	GT218
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	27 June 2017 (6 years ago)	12 October 2009 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$29.49
Current price	$6074	$96 (3.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4096	16
CUDA cores	no data	16
Core clock speed	1250 MHz	589 MHz
Boost clock speed	1350 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	12,500 million	260 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	30.5 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	no data	105 °C
Texture fill rate	345.6	4.160
Floating-point performance	11,059 gflops	39.36 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	no data	PCI-E 2.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	267 mm	6.60" (16.8 cm)
Height	no data	2.731" (6.9 cm)
Width	IGP	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR2
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	512 MB
Memory bus width	2048 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1572 MHz	500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	402.4 GB/s	8.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	DVIVGADisplayPort
Multi monitor support	no data	+
HDMI	no data	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	no data	Internal

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model	6.4	4.1
OpenGL	4.6	3.1
OpenCL	2.0	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.125	N/A
CUDA	no data	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	27 June 2017	12 October 2009
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	512 MB
Chip lithography	14 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	30 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---