GeForce RTX 5060 Ti vs Radeon Pro Vega 56

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro Vega 56 with GeForce RTX 5060 Ti, including specs and performance data.

Pro Vega 56
2017
8 GB HBM2, 210 Watt
30.93

RTX 5060 Ti outperforms Pro Vega 56 by an impressive 84% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking19849
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation44.8488.06
Power efficiency10.4022.10
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameVega 10GB206
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date14 August 2017 (7 years ago)16 April 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 $379

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RTX 5060 Ti has 96% better value for money than Pro Vega 56.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35844608
Core clock speed1138 MHz2407 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHz2572 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million21,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)210 Watt180 Watt
Texture fill rate280.0370.4
Floating-point processing power8.96 TFLOPS23.7 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs224144
Tensor Coresno data144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed786 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth402.4 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI++

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro Vega 56 30.93
RTX 5060 Ti 56.78
+83.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro Vega 56 12353
RTX 5060 Ti 22673
+83.5%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Pro Vega 56 25589
RTX 5060 Ti 51400
+101%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Pro Vega 56 17797
RTX 5060 Ti 42065
+136%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD96
−78.1%
171
+78.1%
1440p45−50
−91.1%
86
+91.1%
4K57
+5.6%
54
−5.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.16
−87.5%
2.22
+87.5%
1440p8.87
−101%
4.41
+101%
4K7.00
+0.3%
7.02
−0.3%
  • RTX 5060 Ti has 88% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RTX 5060 Ti has 101% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • Pro Vega 56 and RTX 5060 Ti have nearly equal cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 70−75
−208%
219
+208%
Counter-Strike 2 170−180
−64.9%
280−290
+64.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
−98.5%
130−140
+98.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 70−75
−144%
173
+144%
Battlefield 5 110−120
−42%
150−160
+42%
Counter-Strike 2 170−180
−64.9%
280−290
+64.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
−98.5%
130−140
+98.5%
Far Cry 5 95−100
−178%
270
+178%
Fortnite 130−140
−74.6%
240−250
+74.6%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−78.6%
200−210
+78.6%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
−69.5%
160−170
+69.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
−46.7%
170−180
+46.7%
Valorant 190−200
−56.3%
290−300
+56.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 70−75
−108%
148
+108%
Battlefield 5 110−120
−42%
150−160
+42%
Counter-Strike 2 170−180
−64.9%
280−290
+64.9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
−1.5%
270−280
+1.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
−98.5%
130−140
+98.5%
Dota 2 107
−77.6%
190−200
+77.6%
Far Cry 5 95−100
−156%
248
+156%
Fortnite 130−140
−74.6%
240−250
+74.6%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−78.6%
200−210
+78.6%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
−69.5%
160−170
+69.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 100−110
−48.6%
150−160
+48.6%
Metro Exodus 65−70
−100%
130−140
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
−46.7%
170−180
+46.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 116
−186%
332
+186%
Valorant 190−200
−56.3%
290−300
+56.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 70−75
−98.6%
141
+98.6%
Battlefield 5 110−120
−42%
150−160
+42%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
−98.5%
130−140
+98.5%
Dota 2 102
−76.5%
180−190
+76.5%
Far Cry 5 95−100
−139%
232
+139%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−78.6%
200−210
+78.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
−46.7%
170−180
+46.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 64
−147%
158
+147%
Valorant 190−200
−56.3%
290−300
+56.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 130−140
−74.6%
240−250
+74.6%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
−120%
150−160
+120%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
−88.5%
350−400
+88.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
−102%
110−120
+102%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−105%
85−90
+105%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 220−230
−47.4%
300−350
+47.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 40−45
−130%
99
+130%
Battlefield 5 80−85
−63%
130−140
+63%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−125%
70−75
+125%
Far Cry 5 70−75
−127%
161
+127%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−111%
170−180
+111%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−125%
119
+125%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
−100%
150−160
+100%

4K
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 21−24
−286%
85
+286%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−119%
70−75
+119%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
−119%
120−130
+119%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−108%
50−55
+108%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 42
−140%
101
+140%
Valorant 180−190
−71.7%
300−350
+71.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 21−24
−136%
52
+136%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−95.7%
90−95
+95.7%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−119%
70−75
+119%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−143%
30−35
+143%
Dota 2 96
−77.1%
170−180
+77.1%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−127%
84
+127%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−126%
120−130
+126%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−171%
95−100
+171%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
−126%
75−80
+126%

This is how Pro Vega 56 and RTX 5060 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5060 Ti is 78% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5060 Ti is 91% faster in 1440p
  • Pro Vega 56 is 6% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Baldur's Gate 3, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 5060 Ti is 286% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 5060 Ti is ahead in 62 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.93 56.78
Recency 14 August 2017 16 April 2025
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 210 Watt 180 Watt

RTX 5060 Ti has a 83.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 16.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro Vega 56 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 56 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 5060 Ti is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
Radeon Pro Vega 56
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 91 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 56 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 478 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5060 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro Vega 56 or GeForce RTX 5060 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.