Arc 8-Cores iGPU vs Radeon Pro Vega 56

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro Vega 56 with Arc 8-Cores iGPU, including specs and performance data.

Pro Vega 56
2017
8 GB HBM2, 210 Watt
31.99
+76.4%

Pro Vega 56 outperforms Arc 8-Cores iGPU by an impressive 76% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking162284
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.16no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2021)Xe LPG
GPU code nameVegaMeteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date14 December 2017 (6 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data
Current price$4999 (12.5x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35848
Core clock speed1247 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1250 MHz2300 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)210 Wattno data
Texture fill rate280.0no data
Floating-point performance9,677 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro Vega 56 and Arc 8-Cores iGPU compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width2048 Bitno data
Memory clock speed786 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth402.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_2
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.1.125no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro Vega 56 31.99
+76.4%
Arc 8-Cores iGPU 18.14

Radeon Pro Vega 56 outperforms Arc 8-Cores iGPU by 76% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Pro Vega 56 25589
+108%
Arc 8-Cores iGPU 12276

Radeon Pro Vega 56 outperforms Arc 8-Cores iGPU by 108% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Pro Vega 56 17797
+105%
Arc 8-Cores iGPU 8679

Radeon Pro Vega 56 outperforms Arc 8-Cores iGPU by 105% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD101
+153%
40
−153%
1440p27−30
+68.8%
16
−68.8%
4K65
+85.7%
35−40
−85.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+80%
30−33
−80%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60 no data
Battlefield 5 100−110 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+80%
30−33
−80%
Far Cry 5 70−75 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85 no data
Forza Horizon 4 130−140 no data
Hitman 3 65−70 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130 no data
Metro Exodus 95−100
+78.2%
55−60
−78.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60 no data
Battlefield 5 100−110 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+80%
30−33
−80%
Far Cry 5 70−75 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85 no data
Forza Horizon 4 130−140 no data
Hitman 3 65−70 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130 no data
Metro Exodus 95−100 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 116 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+85.7%
35−40
−85.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+80%
30−33
−80%
Far Cry 5 70−75 no data
Forza Horizon 4 130−140 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+82.9%
70−75
−82.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
+80%
65−70
−80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 64 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+80%
45−50
−80%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+103%
30−33
−103%
Far Cry New Dawn 70−75
+80%
40−45
−80%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+91.7%
24−27
−91.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Far Cry 5 55−60 no data
Forza Horizon 4 65−70 no data
Hitman 3 40−45
+90.5%
21−24
−90.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+94.3%
35−40
−94.3%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+103%
30−33
−103%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70−75
+85%
40−45
−85%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+80%
30−33
−80%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+77.8%
18−20
−77.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%
Hitman 3 24−27 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 42 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Far Cry 5 18−20 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+85.7%
21−24
−85.7%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+77.8%
18−20
−77.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+100%
14−16
−100%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+96.7%
30−33
−96.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+81.5%
27−30
−81.5%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Hitman 3 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+106%
18−20
−106%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+83.3%
18−20
−83.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+87.5%
16−18
−87.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+100%
18−20
−100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+94.4%
18−20
−94.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+94.4%
18−20
−94.4%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%

This is how Pro Vega 56 and Arc 8-Cores iGPU compete in popular games:

  • Pro Vega 56 is 153% faster in 1080p
  • Pro Vega 56 is 69% faster in 1440p
  • Pro Vega 56 is 86% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 31.99 18.14
Recency 14 December 2017 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm

The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc 8-Cores iGPU in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 56 is a workstation card while Arc 8-Cores iGPU is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
Radeon Pro Vega 56
Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU
Arc 8-Cores iGPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 88 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 56 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 30 votes

Rate Arc 8-Cores iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.