AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile
Comparison of Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Quadro T1000 Mobile architecture, market type and release date.
Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Quadro T1000 Mobile's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Quadro T1000 Mobile's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Quadro T1000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Parameters of memory installed on Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Quadro T1000 Mobile: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Quadro T1000 Mobile. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.
APIs supported by Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Quadro T1000 Mobile, sometimes including their particular versions.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Quadro T1000 Mobile. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
Pro Vega 16 21.60
T1000 Mobile 48.89 +126.3%
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Pro Vega 16 56273 +4.9%
T1000 Mobile 53629
3DMark Fire Strike Score
Pro Vega 16 6902
T1000 Mobile 7298 +5.7%
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Pro Vega 16 7745
T1000 Mobile 8143 +5.1%
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
Pro Vega 16 10569
T1000 Mobile 11270 +6.6%
Let's see how good Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Quadro T1000 Mobile are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
Wider memory bus (1024 vs 128 bit)
More pipelines (1024 vs 768)
Higher memory bandwidth (307.2 vs 128 GB/s)
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile
126.3% faster (about 2.5 times) in synthetic tests
Somewhat newer (27 May 2019 vs 14 November 2018)
Finer manufacturing process technology (12 vs 14 nm)
Less power hungry (50 vs 75 watts)
So, Pro Vega 16 or Quadro T1000 Mobile?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile.
Should you still have questions on choice between Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Quadro T1000 Mobile, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.