AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile

General info

Comparison of Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Quadro T1000 Mobile architecture, market type and release date.
Place in performance rating
GCN 5.0
Code name
Vega 12
Mobile workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
14 November 2018
27 May 2019

Technical specs

Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Quadro T1000 Mobile's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Quadro T1000 Mobile's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
no data
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
1455 MHz
Transistor count
no data
4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
50 Watt
Texture fill rate

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Quadro T1000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size
medium sized
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16


Parameters of memory installed on Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Quadro T1000 Mobile: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
4 GB
Memory bus width
1024 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
2400 MHz
8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
307.2 GB/s
128.0 GB/s
Shared memory

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Quadro T1000 Mobile. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs

API support

APIs supported by Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Quadro T1000 Mobile, sometimes including their particular versions.
12 (12_1)
12 (12_1)

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Quadro T1000 Mobile. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Overall benchmark performance

Pro Vega 16 21.60
T1000 Mobile 48.89 +126.3%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Pro Vega 16 56273 +4.9%
T1000 Mobile 53629

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Pro Vega 16 6902
T1000 Mobile 7298 +5.7%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Pro Vega 16 7745
T1000 Mobile 8143 +5.1%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Pro Vega 16 10569
T1000 Mobile 11270 +6.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Quadro T1000 Mobile are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16

Wider memory bus (1024 vs 128 bit)
More pipelines (1024 vs 768)
Higher memory bandwidth (307.2 vs 128 GB/s)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile

126.3% faster (about 2.5 times) in synthetic tests
Somewhat newer (27 May 2019 vs 14 November 2018)
Finer manufacturing process technology (12 vs 14 nm)
Less power hungry (50 vs 75 watts)

So, Pro Vega 16 or Quadro T1000 Mobile?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile.
Should you still have questions on choice between Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Quadro T1000 Mobile, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite video card.
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the video card, as well as rate it yourself.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about Radeon Pro Vega 16 or Quadro T1000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
AliExpress WW