ATI FirePro M7740 vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000M

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

Quadro 5000M
5.31
+158%

Quadro 5000M outperforms FirePro M7740 by 158% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking576828
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.080.14
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Terascale 1 (2008−2010)
GPU code nameFermiRV740
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date27 July 2010 (13 years old)4 August 2009 (14 years old)
Current price$3732 $255
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

ATI M7740 has 75% better value for money than Quadro 5000M.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320640
Core clock speed405 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million826 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate16.2020.80
Floating-point performance518.4 gflops832.0 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro 5000M and FirePro M7740 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s54.14 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro 5000M 5.31
+158%
ATI M7740 2.06

Quadro 5000M outperforms FirePro M7740 by 158% in our combined benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro 5000M 7767
+17.2%
ATI M7740 6626

Quadro 5000M outperforms FirePro M7740 by 17% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+54.5%
10−12
−54.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Hitman 3 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+54.5%
10−12
−54.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Hitman 3 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Hitman 3 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Hitman 3 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Quadro 5000M is 1100% faster than the ATI M7740.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro 5000M is ahead in 47 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 5.31 2.06
Recency 27 July 2010 4 August 2009
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 60 Watt

The Quadro 5000M is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro M7740 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
Quadro 5000M
ATI FirePro M7740
FirePro M7740

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro 5000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate ATI FirePro M7740 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.