Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs Radeon Pro SSG

Place in performance ranking	181	289
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	30.46	no data
Architecture	GCN 3.0 (2014−2017)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Fiji	N19P-Q3 MAX-Q
Market segment	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	26 July 2016 (7 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$9,999	no data
Current price	$321 (0x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4096	1024
Core clock speed	1440 MHz	930 / 1200 MHz
Boost clock speed	1050 MHz	1500 / 1620 MHz
Number of transistors	8,900 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	260 Watt	35 - 40 Watt
Texture fill rate	268.8	103.7
Floating-point performance	12,288 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro SSG and Quadro T2000 Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	4096 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MBps	8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	512.0 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 1.4a, 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.2	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.170	1.2.131
CUDA	no data	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro SSG 28.41
+58.7%

T2000 Max-Q 17.90

Radeon Pro SSG outperforms Quadro T2000 Max-Q by 59% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro SSG 10971
+58.7%

T2000 Max-Q 6912

Radeon Pro SSG outperforms Quadro T2000 Max-Q by 59% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	90−95 +52.5%	59 −52.5%
1440p	40−45 +53.8%	26 −53.8%
4K	55−60 +48.6%	37 −48.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

40−45
+42.9%

27−30

−42.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	80−85 +50.9%	53 −50.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 +50%	30−33 −50%
Battlefield 5	90−95 +52.5%	55−60 −52.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 +52.8%	35−40 −52.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +42.9%	27−30 −42.9%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +54.8%	40−45 −54.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	75−80 +56.3%	45−50 −56.3%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +56.6%	80−85 −56.6%
Hitman 3	55−60 +57.1%	35−40 −57.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	150−160 +56.3%	96 −56.3%
Metro Exodus	130−140 +51.2%	86 −51.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	100−105 +56.3%	64 −56.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	90−95 +57.9%	55−60 −57.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 +54.5%	55−60 −54.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	70−75 +55.6%	45 −55.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 +50%	30−33 −50%
Battlefield 5	90−95 +52.5%	55−60 −52.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 +52.8%	35−40 −52.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +42.9%	27−30 −42.9%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +54.8%	40−45 −54.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	75−80 +56.3%	45−50 −56.3%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +56.6%	80−85 −56.6%
Hitman 3	55−60 +57.1%	35−40 −57.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +54.9%	70−75 −54.9%
Metro Exodus	95−100 +58.3%	60 −58.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85 +50.9%	53 −50.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	90−95 +57.9%	55−60 −57.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	95−100 +50.8%	63 −50.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 +54.5%	55−60 −54.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +40%	25 −40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 +50%	30−33 −50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 +52.8%	35−40 −52.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +42.9%	27−30 −42.9%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +54.8%	40−45 −54.8%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +56.6%	80−85 −56.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	85−90 +54.5%	55 −54.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	90−95 +57.9%	55−60 −57.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 +51.5%	33 −51.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 +54.5%	55−60 −54.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

70−75
+48.9%

−48.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 +47.1%	30−35 −47.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 +57.1%	35−40 −57.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +50%	18−20 −50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 +50%	16−18 −50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +52.2%	21−24 −52.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +50%	30−33 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +57.1%	35−40 −57.1%
Hitman 3	30−33 +42.9%	21−24 −42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +52.8%	35−40 −52.8%
Metro Exodus	50−55 +51.5%	30−35 −51.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 +57.1%	35−40 −57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 +50%	20−22 −50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 +50%	12−14 −50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

45−50
+55.2%

27−30

−55.2%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 +50%	18−20 −50%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 +38.5%	12−14 −38.5%
Hitman 3	18−20 +38.5%	12−14 −38.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 +50%	20−22 −50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 +45.5%	10−12 −45.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +50%	18−20 −50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +55.6%	9−10 −55.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +55.6%	9−10 −55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +45.8%	24−27 −45.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 +50%	20−22 −50%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +41.2%	16−18 −41.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%