Radeon RX 6300M vs 680M

Place in the ranking	501	331
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	11.96	32.81
Architecture	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Rembrandt+	Navi 24
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	3 January 2023 (2 years ago)	4 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	768
Core clock speed	2000 MHz	2000 MHz
Boost clock speed	2200 MHz	2400 MHz
Number of transistors	13,100 million	5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	105.6	115.2
Floating-point processing power	3.379 TFLOPS	3.686 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	48	48
Ray Tracing Cores	12	12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	2 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	32 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	72 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 680M 8.67

RX 6300M 16.65
+92%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 680M 3334

RX 6300M 6398
+91.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	37 −89.2%	70−75 +89.2%
1440p	18 −66.7%	30−35 +66.7%
4K	10 −80%	18−20 +80%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	28 −3.6%	27−30 +3.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	39 +18.2%	30−35 −18.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −92.9%	50−55 +92.9%
Counter-Strike 2	26 −11.5%	27−30 +11.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	14 −136%	30−35 +136%
Forza Horizon 4	56 −23.2%	65−70 +23.2%
Forza Horizon 5	38 −15.8%	40−45 +15.8%
Metro Exodus	39 −15.4%	45−50 +15.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −66.7%	40−45 +66.7%
Valorant	161 +140%	65−70 −140%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −92.9%	50−55 +92.9%
Counter-Strike 2	21 −38.1%	27−30 +38.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	11 −200%	30−35 +200%
Dota 2	48 −25%	60−65 +25%
Far Cry 5	36 −63.9%	55−60 +63.9%
Fortnite	50−55 −78.4%	90−95 +78.4%
Forza Horizon 4	47 −46.8%	65−70 +46.8%
Forza Horizon 5	21−24 −110%	40−45 +110%
Grand Theft Auto V	36 −63.9%	55−60 +63.9%
Metro Exodus	27 −66.7%	45−50 +66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	65−70 −72.1%	110−120 +72.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −66.7%	40−45 +66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −96.2%	50−55 +96.2%
Valorant	30 −123%	65−70 +123%
World of Tanks	120−130 −61.2%	200−210 +61.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −92.9%	50−55 +92.9%
Counter-Strike 2	18 −61.1%	27−30 +61.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	9 −267%	30−35 +267%
Dota 2	61 +1.7%	60−65 −1.7%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −59.5%	55−60 +59.5%
Forza Horizon 4	40 −72.5%	65−70 +72.5%
Forza Horizon 5	26 −69.2%	40−45 +69.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	65−70 −72.1%	110−120 +72.1%
Valorant	146 +118%	65−70 −118%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	17 −47.1%	24−27 +47.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	17 −52.9%	24−27 +52.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 −269%	150−160 +269%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −114%	14−16 +114%
World of Tanks	60−65 −85.5%	110−120 +85.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 −113%	30−35 +113%
Counter-Strike 2	10 −210%	30−35 +210%
Cyberpunk 2077	5 −160%	12−14 +160%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −133%	40−45 +133%
Forza Horizon 4	27 −55.6%	40−45 +55.6%
Forza Horizon 5	12−14 −100%	24−27 +100%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −147%	35−40 +147%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	17 −35.3%	21−24 +35.3%
Valorant	21−24 −90.9%	40−45 +90.9%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Dota 2	18−20 −52.6%	27−30 +52.6%
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 −47.4%	27−30 +47.4%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −200%	12−14 +200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	24−27 −96%	45−50 +96%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −83.3%	10−12 +83.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −47.4%	27−30 +47.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 −129%	16−18 +129%
Counter-Strike 2	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Cyberpunk 2077	2 −150%	5−6 +150%
Dota 2	18 −61.1%	27−30 +61.1%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −110%	21−24 +110%
Fortnite	9−10 −111%	18−20 +111%
Forza Horizon 4	14 −71.4%	24−27 +71.4%
Forza Horizon 5	6−7 −117%	12−14 +117%
Valorant	8−9 −138%	18−20 +138%

This is how Radeon 680M and RX 6300M compete in popular games:

RX 6300M is 89% faster in 1080p
RX 6300M is 67% faster in 1440p
RX 6300M is 80% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Radeon 680M is 140% faster.
in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6300M is 300% faster.

All in all, in popular games: