Arc B580 vs RTX A4500 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A4500 Mobile with Arc B580, including specs and performance data.

RTX A4500 Mobile
2022
16 GB GDDR6, 140 Watt
38.45
+10.7%

RTX A4500 Mobile outperforms Arc B580 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking86116
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data88.18
Power efficiency21.8014.48
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Xe2 (2024)
GPU code nameGA104BMG-G21
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date22 March 2022 (2 years ago)16 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores58882560
Core clock speed930 MHz2670 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz2670 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 million19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate276.0427.2
Floating-point processing power17.66 TFLOPS13.67 TFLOPS
ROPs9680
TMUs184160
Tensor Cores184160
Ray Tracing Cores4620

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data272 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2375 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s456.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA8.6-
DLSS++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX A4500 Mobile 38.45
+10.7%
Arc B580 34.73

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A4500 Mobile 17182
+10.7%
Arc B580 15518

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD130−140
+4%
125
−4%
1440p75−80
+10.3%
68
−10.3%
4K45−50
+7.1%
42
−7.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data1.99
1440pno data3.66
4Kno data5.93

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 120−130
−63.5%
206
+63.5%
Counter-Strike 2 230−240
+9.4%
210−220
−9.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
−15.5%
112
+15.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 120−130
−17.5%
148
+17.5%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+6.2%
120−130
−6.2%
Counter-Strike 2 230−240
+9.4%
210−220
−9.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+0%
97
+0%
Far Cry 5 120−130
−36.2%
173
+36.2%
Fortnite 170−180
+8.6%
160−170
−8.6%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+10.4%
140−150
−10.4%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
−50.8%
193
+50.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+8.1%
140−150
−8.1%
Valorant 230−240
+7.3%
220−230
−7.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 120−130
+24.8%
101
−24.8%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+6.2%
120−130
−6.2%
Counter-Strike 2 230−240
+9.4%
210−220
−9.4%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0.4%
270−280
−0.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+18.3%
82
−18.3%
Dota 2 140−150
+12.3%
130−140
−12.3%
Far Cry 5 120−130
−26%
160
+26%
Fortnite 170−180
+8.6%
160−170
−8.6%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+10.4%
140−150
−10.4%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
−35.9%
174
+35.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 130−140
−4.5%
140
+4.5%
Metro Exodus 100−105
−6%
106
+6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+8.1%
140−150
−8.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150
−59.5%
236
+59.5%
Valorant 230−240
+7.3%
220−230
−7.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+6.2%
120−130
−6.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+26%
77
−26%
Dota 2 140−150
+12.3%
130−140
−12.3%
Far Cry 5 120−130
−17.3%
149
+17.3%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+10.4%
140−150
−10.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+8.1%
140−150
−8.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150
+74.1%
85
−74.1%
Valorant 230−240
+7.3%
220−230
−7.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 170−180
+8.6%
160−170
−8.6%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+14.7%
95−100
−14.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 280−290
+11.3%
250−260
−11.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 85−90
+23.2%
69
−23.2%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−1.6%
62
+1.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+6%
250−260
−6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+8.3%
95−100
−8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−14.3%
56
+14.3%
Far Cry 5 100−105
−10%
110
+10%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+13.2%
100−110
−13.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+17.6%
68
−17.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+13.3%
95−100
−13.3%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+13.6%
40−45
−13.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 90−95
+17.9%
78
−17.9%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−21.1%
46
+21.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
−25.4%
84
+25.4%
Valorant 250−260
+10.6%
220−230
−10.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+11.9%
55−60
−11.9%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+13.6%
40−45
−13.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−30.4%
30
+30.4%
Dota 2 110−120
+15%
100−105
−15%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−5.4%
59
+5.4%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+15.7%
70−75
−15.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+20.4%
45−50
−20.4%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+14.6%
45−50
−14.6%

This is how RTX A4500 Mobile and Arc B580 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A4500 Mobile is 4% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A4500 Mobile is 10% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A4500 Mobile is 7% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX A4500 Mobile is 74% faster.
  • in Atomic Heart, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the Arc B580 is 63% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX A4500 Mobile is ahead in 40 tests (67%)
  • Arc B580 is ahead in 18 tests (30%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.45 34.73
Recency 22 March 2022 16 January 2025
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 190 Watt

RTX A4500 Mobile has a 10.7% higher aggregate performance score, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 35.7% lower power consumption.

Arc B580, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A4500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc B580 in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX A4500 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Arc B580 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile
RTX A4500
Intel Arc B580
Arc B580

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 17 votes

Rate RTX A4500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 552 votes

Rate Arc B580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX A4500 Mobile or Arc B580, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.