GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile vs RTX A2000

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A2000 with GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX A2000
2021
6 GB GDDR6, 70 Watt
35.49
+40.9%

RTX A2000 outperforms RTX 3050 6GB Mobile by a considerable 41% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking142218
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation90.03no data
Power efficiency34.9728.95
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGA106GN20-P0-R 6 GB
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date10 August 2021 (3 years ago)6 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores33282560
Core clock speed562 MHz1237 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz1492 MHz
Number of transistors12,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate124.8no data
Floating-point processing power7.987 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48no data
TMUs104no data
Tensor Cores104no data
Ray Tracing Cores26no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length167 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB6 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4ano data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA8.6-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX A2000 35.49
+40.9%
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 25.19

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX A2000 19978
+14.7%
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 17421

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX A2000 14934
+24.9%
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 11960

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX A2000 94407
+30.2%
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 72486

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX A2000 561627
+12.2%
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 500518

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD94
+36.2%
69
−36.2%
1440p45
+21.6%
37
−21.6%
4K29
+61.1%
18−21
−61.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.78no data
1440p9.98no data
4K15.48no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 84
+78.7%
45−50
−78.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+27.3%
75−80
−27.3%
Counter-Strike 2 62
+29.2%
48
−29.2%
Forza Horizon 4 166
+58.1%
105
−58.1%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
+37.3%
65−70
−37.3%
Metro Exodus 106
+60.6%
65−70
−60.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+29.1%
55−60
−29.1%
Valorant 140−150
+39.6%
100−110
−39.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+27.3%
75−80
−27.3%
Counter-Strike 2 52
+30%
40
−30%
Dota 2 129
+111%
61
−111%
Far Cry 5 136
+40.2%
97
−40.2%
Fortnite 160−170
+27%
120−130
−27%
Forza Horizon 4 130
+51.2%
86
−51.2%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
+37.3%
65−70
−37.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 129
+41.8%
91
−41.8%
Metro Exodus 71
+7.6%
65−70
−7.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200
+21.5%
150−160
−21.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+29.1%
55−60
−29.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+50%
80−85
−50%
Valorant 140−150
+39.6%
100−110
−39.6%
World of Tanks 270−280
+7.7%
250−260
−7.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+27.3%
75−80
−27.3%
Counter-Strike 2 45
+32.4%
34
−32.4%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+20.8%
75−80
−20.8%
Forza Horizon 4 109
+43.4%
76
−43.4%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
+37.3%
65−70
−37.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200
+21.5%
150−160
−21.5%
Valorant 140−150
+39.6%
100−110
−39.6%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 58
+45%
40
−45%
Grand Theft Auto V 58
+45%
40
−45%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+47.8%
21−24
−47.8%
World of Tanks 220−230
+36.1%
160−170
−36.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+31.4%
50−55
−31.4%
Counter-Strike 2 26
+23.8%
21
−23.8%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+54.1%
70−75
−54.1%
Forza Horizon 4 79
+38.6%
57
−38.6%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+45%
40−45
−45%
Metro Exodus 62
+8.8%
55−60
−8.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 47
+27%
37
−27%
Valorant 100−110
+57.4%
65−70
−57.4%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+56.5%
21−24
−56.5%
Dota 2 56
+27.3%
40−45
−27.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 56
+27.3%
40−45
−27.3%
Metro Exodus 20
+5.3%
18−20
−5.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+46.8%
75−80
−46.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 56
+27.3%
40−45
−27.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+53.8%
24−27
−53.8%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+56.5%
21−24
−56.5%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+54.5%
30−35
−54.5%
Fortnite 45−50
+58.1%
30−35
−58.1%
Forza Horizon 4 45
+15.4%
35−40
−15.4%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
Valorant 55−60
+66.7%
30−35
−66.7%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 81
+0%
81
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 32
+0%
32
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 23
+0%
23
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 19
+0%
19
+0%
Dota 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

This is how RTX A2000 and RTX 3050 6GB Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX A2000 is 36% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A2000 is 22% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A2000 is 61% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX A2000 is 111% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX A2000 is ahead in 55 tests (86%)
  • there's a draw in 9 tests (14%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.49 25.19
Recency 10 August 2021 6 January 2023
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 60 Watt

RTX A2000 has a 40.9% higher aggregate performance score.

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 16.7% lower power consumption.

The RTX A2000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX A2000 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A2000
RTX A2000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 587 votes

Rate RTX A2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 697 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.