RTX A2000 vs GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6
24.99

RTX A2000 outperforms GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile by a considerable 42% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking200133
Place by popularity71not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data18.83
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2022)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameGN20-P1GA106
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date10 May 2021 (3 years ago)10 August 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449
Current priceno data$567 (1.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25603328
Core clock speed1222 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1485 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors13,250 million13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)70 Watt
Texture fill rate118.8124.8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile and RTX A2000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz12 GB/s
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.2
CUDA8.68.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD75
−33.3%
100−110
+33.3%
1440p42
−31%
55−60
+31%
4K26
−34.6%
35−40
+34.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 62
−37.1%
85−90
+37.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
−32.7%
65−70
+32.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60
−41.7%
85−90
+41.7%
Battlefield 5 108
−38.9%
150−160
+38.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
−36.4%
90−95
+36.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 59
−35.6%
80−85
+35.6%
Far Cry 5 79
−39.2%
110−120
+39.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 84
−31%
110−120
+31%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−32.5%
110−120
+32.5%
Hitman 3 105
−33.3%
140−150
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65
−38.5%
90−95
+38.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 76
−31.6%
100−105
+31.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 95
−36.8%
130−140
+36.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 59
−35.6%
80−85
+35.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
−32.7%
65−70
+32.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35
−28.6%
45−50
+28.6%
Battlefield 5 98
−32.7%
130−140
+32.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
−36.4%
90−95
+36.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
−33.3%
60−65
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 74
−35.1%
100−105
+35.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 82
−34.1%
110−120
+34.1%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−32.5%
110−120
+32.5%
Hitman 3 89
−34.8%
120−130
+34.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 56
−33.9%
75−80
+33.9%
Metro Exodus 57
−40.4%
80−85
+40.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 39
−41%
55−60
+41%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 76
−31.6%
100−105
+31.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 92
−41.3%
130−140
+41.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55
−36.4%
75−80
+36.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
−32.7%
65−70
+32.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 26
−34.6%
35−40
+34.6%
Battlefield 5 89
−34.8%
120−130
+34.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
−37.5%
55−60
+37.5%
Far Cry 5 68
−39.7%
95−100
+39.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 73
−37%
100−105
+37%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−32.5%
110−120
+32.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
−40%
70−75
+40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 28
−25%
35−40
+25%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−31.6%
50−55
+31.6%
Hitman 3 62
−37.1%
85−90
+37.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 52
−34.6%
70−75
+34.6%
Metro Exodus 34
−32.4%
45−50
+32.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 44
−36.4%
60−65
+36.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−29.6%
35−40
+29.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 26
−34.6%
35−40
+34.6%
Battlefield 5 69
−37.7%
95−100
+37.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
−36.4%
30−33
+36.4%
Far Cry 5 50
−40%
70−75
+40%
Far Cry New Dawn 60
−41.7%
85−90
+41.7%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−37.3%
70−75
+37.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
−33.3%
40−45
+33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20
−35%
27−30
+35%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%
Hitman 3 33
−36.4%
45−50
+36.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
Metro Exodus 21
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 19
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
−37.9%
40−45
+37.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Battlefield 5 38
−31.6%
50−55
+31.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
−40%
14−16
+40%
Far Cry 5 21
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 28
−25%
35−40
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−28.6%
45−50
+28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10
−40%
14−16
+40%

This is how RTX 3050 Ti Mobile and RTX A2000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A2000 is 33% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A2000 is 31% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A2000 is 35% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.99 35.61
Recency 10 May 2021 10 August 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 70 Watt

The RTX A2000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is a notebook card while RTX A2000 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
NVIDIA RTX A2000
RTX A2000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3871 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 506 votes

Rate RTX A2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.