Arc A370M vs RTX A2000

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A2000 with Arc A370M, including specs and performance data.

RTX A2000
2021
6 GB GDDR6, 70 Watt
30.37
+165%

RTX A2000 outperforms Arc A370M by a whopping 165% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking155401
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation92.84no data
Power efficiency34.4025.94
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGA106DG2-128
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date10 August 2021 (3 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores33281024
Core clock speed562 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz1550 MHz
Number of transistors12,000 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate124.899.20
Floating-point processing power7.987 TFLOPS3.174 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs10464
Tensor Cores104no data
Ray Tracing Cores268

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length167 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX A2000 30.37
+165%
Arc A370M 11.45

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A2000 13570
+165%
Arc A370M 5115

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX A2000 19978
+65.3%
Arc A370M 12090

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX A2000 14934
+83.3%
Arc A370M 8149

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX A2000 94407
+165%
Arc A370M 35604

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD91
+133%
39
−133%
1440p43
+115%
20
−115%
4K28
−21.4%
34
+21.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.93no data
1440p10.44no data
4K16.04no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+172%
65−70
−172%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+60.9%
46
−60.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75
+72.1%
43
−72.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+120%
50−55
−120%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+172%
65−70
−172%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+100%
37
−100%
Far Cry 5 108
+120%
49
−120%
Fortnite 140−150
+104%
70−75
−104%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+142%
50−55
−142%
Forza Horizon 5 121
+210%
35−40
−210%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75
+147%
30
−147%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+191%
45−50
−191%
Valorant 200−210
+87%
100−110
−87%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+120%
50−55
−120%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+172%
65−70
−172%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+57.7%
170−180
−57.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+196%
25
−196%
Far Cry 5 98
+113%
46
−113%
Fortnite 140−150
+104%
70−75
−104%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+142%
50−55
−142%
Forza Horizon 5 106
+172%
35−40
−172%
Grand Theft Auto V 129
+345%
29
−345%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75
+270%
20
−270%
Metro Exodus 60
+76.5%
34
−76.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+191%
45−50
−191%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 117
+121%
53
−121%
Valorant 200−210
+87%
100−110
−87%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+120%
50−55
−120%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+252%
21
−252%
Far Cry 5 91
+112%
43
−112%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+142%
50−55
−142%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75
+469%
13
−469%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+191%
45−50
−191%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 64
+146%
26
−146%
Valorant 200−210
+87%
100−110
−87%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 140−150
+104%
70−75
−104%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+248%
21−24
−248%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+144%
90−95
−144%
Grand Theft Auto V 58
+427%
11
−427%
Metro Exodus 34
+70%
20
−70%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+73.3%
100−110
−73.3%
Valorant 230−240
+78.2%
130−140
−78.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+156%
30−35
−156%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+227%
10−12
−227%
Far Cry 5 61
+110%
29
−110%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+200%
30−33
−200%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+171%
14−16
−171%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 47
+135%
20−22
−135%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 80−85
+211%
27−30
−211%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+429%
7−8
−429%
Grand Theft Auto V 56
+133%
24−27
−133%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
Metro Exodus 20
+150%
8−9
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40
+150%
16−18
−150%
Valorant 190−200
+197%
65−70
−197%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+200%
16−18
−200%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+429%
7−8
−429%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Far Cry 5 30
+131%
12−14
−131%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+173%
21−24
−173%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+233%
12−14
−233%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+233%
12−14
−233%

Full HD
High Preset

Dota 2 68
+0%
68
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 66
+0%
66
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 40
+0%
40
+0%

This is how RTX A2000 and Arc A370M compete in popular games:

  • RTX A2000 is 133% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A2000 is 115% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A370M is 21% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Hogwarts Legacy, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX A2000 is 469% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX A2000 is ahead in 63 tests (95%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.37 11.45
Recency 10 August 2021 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 35 Watt

RTX A2000 has a 165.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Arc A370M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The RTX A2000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A370M in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX A2000 is a workstation card while Arc A370M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A2000
RTX A2000
Intel Arc A370M
Arc A370M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 600 votes

Rate RTX A2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 178 votes

Rate Arc A370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX A2000 or Arc A370M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.