Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs Qualcomm Adreno 690

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Qualcomm Adreno 690 and Qualcomm Adreno 680, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Qualcomm Adreno 690
2018
7 Watt
2.73
+23%

Qualcomm Adreno 690 outperforms Qualcomm Adreno 680 by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking805860
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency26.9121.88
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 December 2018 (6 years ago)6 December 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Manufacturing process technology5 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt7 Watt

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Shared memory++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Qualcomm Adreno 690 2.73
+23%
Qualcomm Adreno 680 2.22

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Qualcomm Adreno 690 1049
+22.8%
Qualcomm Adreno 680 854

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Qualcomm Adreno 690 2912
+50.5%
Qualcomm Adreno 680 1936

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD23
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Elden Ring 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Dota 2 14
+180%
5−6
−180%
Elden Ring 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 16
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Fortnite 14−16
+36.4%
10−12
−36.4%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
World of Tanks 45−50
+16.7%
40−45
−16.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Dota 2 35
+600%
5−6
−600%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 0−1 0−1
Elden Ring 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+26.7%
14−16
−26.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
World of Tanks 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Valorant 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Elden Ring 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Valorant 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

This is how Qualcomm Adreno 690 and Qualcomm Adreno 680 compete in popular games:

  • Qualcomm Adreno 690 is 28% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Qualcomm Adreno 690 is 600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Qualcomm Adreno 690 is ahead in 36 tests (69%)
  • there's a draw in 16 tests (31%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.73 2.22
Chip lithography 5 nm 7 nm

Qualcomm Adreno 690 has a 23% higher aggregate performance score, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Qualcomm Adreno 690 is our recommended choice as it beats the Qualcomm Adreno 680 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm Adreno 690
Adreno 690
Qualcomm Adreno 680
Adreno 680

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 11 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 38 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.