Quadro T1200 Mobile vs GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q

Place in performance ranking	195	259
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	9.86	no data
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	N18E-G1 MAX-Q TU106	TU117
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	6 January 2019 (5 years ago)	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price	$1680	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1920	1024
Core clock speed	975 MHz	855 MHz
Boost clock speed	1185 MHz	1425 MHz
Number of transistors	10,800 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	142.2	91.20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q and Quadro T1200 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	11000 MHz	10000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	264.0 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
G-SYNC support	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	7.5	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2060 Max-Q 25.22
+26.4%

T1200 Mobile 19.96

GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q outperforms Quadro T1200 Mobile by 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 2060 Max-Q 19779
+37.5%

T1200 Mobile 14387

GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q outperforms Quadro T1200 Mobile by 37% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 2060 Max-Q 50957
+15.5%

T1200 Mobile 44135

GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q outperforms Quadro T1200 Mobile by 15% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 2060 Max-Q 14910
+47.1%

T1200 Mobile 10134

GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q outperforms Quadro T1200 Mobile by 47% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 2060 Max-Q 58890
+15.9%

T1200 Mobile 50827

GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q outperforms Quadro T1200 Mobile by 16% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	96 +65.5%	58 −65.5%
1440p	44 +33.3%	33 −33.3%
4K	44 −84.1%	81 +84.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

40−45

no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	79	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45	no data
Battlefield 5	80−85	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	82	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45	no data
Far Cry 5	55−60	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70	no data
Forza Horizon 4	100−110	no data
Hitman 3	50−55	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−105	no data
Metro Exodus	143 +30%	110−120 −30%
Red Dead Redemption 2	93	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	130	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75	no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	65	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45	no data
Battlefield 5	80−85	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45	no data
Far Cry 5	55−60	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70	no data
Forza Horizon 4	100−110	no data
Hitman 3	50−55	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−105	no data
Metro Exodus	93	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	88	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	106	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	105	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75	no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55 +37.5%	40−45 −37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45	no data
Far Cry 5	55−60	no data
Forza Horizon 4	100−110	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−105 +33.3%	75−80 −33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	93 +32.9%	70−75 −32.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	57	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75	no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

78
+30%

60−65

−30%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +37.1%	35−40 −37.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +35%	40−45 −35%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 +41.7%	24−27 −41.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18	no data
Far Cry 5	40−45	no data
Forza Horizon 4	50−55	no data
Hitman 3	30−33 +42.9%	21−24 −42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +30%	40−45 −30%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +37.1%	35−40 −37.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 +37.5%	40−45 −37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +29.2%	24−27 −29.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20	no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45
+40%

30−33

−40%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 +38.9%	18−20 −38.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	20−22 +42.9%	14−16 −42.9%
Hitman 3	20−22	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	20	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35	no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7	no data
Far Cry 5	14−16	no data
Forza Horizon 4	35−40	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 +38.1%	21−24 −38.1%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +33.3%	18−20 −33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−12	no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24
+37.5%

16−18

−37.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 +32%	50−55 −32%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +32.5%	40−45 −32.5%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +44.4%	18−20 −44.4%
Hitman 3	24−27 +33.3%	18−20 −33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	32 +33.3%	24−27 −33.3%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +37%	27−30 −37%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +37.5%	24−27 −37.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +36.7%	30−33 −36.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +27.8%	18−20 −27.8%