T1000 Max-Q vs T2000 Mobile

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

T2000 Mobile
20.60
+18.9%

T2000 Mobile outperforms T1000 Max-Q by 19% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking246288
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money4.67no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameN19P-Q3N19P-Q1
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date27 May 2019 (4 years old)27 May 2019 (4 years old)
Current price$2221 no data
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024768
Core clock speed1575 MHz795 / 1230 MHz
Boost clock speed1785 MHz1455 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt35 - 40 Watt
Texture fill rate114.275.60

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro T2000 Mobile and Quadro T1000 Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed8000 MHz8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA7.57.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T2000 Mobile 20.60
+18.9%
T1000 Max-Q 17.33

T2000 Mobile outperforms T1000 Max-Q by 19% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

T2000 Mobile 7985
+18.9%
T1000 Max-Q 6716

T2000 Mobile outperforms T1000 Max-Q by 19% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+16.7%
35−40
−16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+16.9%
55−60
−16.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+20%
45−50
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+20%
45−50
−20%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+17%
45−50
−17%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+16.7%
60−65
−16.7%
Hitman 3 60−65
+22.4%
45−50
−22.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+18.9%
35−40
−18.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+17.2%
27−30
−17.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+18.9%
35−40
−18.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+21.2%
30−35
−21.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+16.7%
35−40
−16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+16.9%
55−60
−16.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+20%
45−50
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+20%
45−50
−20%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+17%
45−50
−17%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+16.7%
60−65
−16.7%
Hitman 3 60−65
+22.4%
45−50
−22.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+18.9%
35−40
−18.9%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+17.2%
27−30
−17.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+18.9%
35−40
−18.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+21.6%
35−40
−21.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+21.2%
30−35
−21.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+16.7%
35−40
−16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+16.9%
55−60
−16.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+20%
45−50
−20%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+17%
45−50
−17%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+16.7%
60−65
−16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+21.6%
35−40
−21.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+21.2%
30−35
−21.2%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+19.2%
24−27
−19.2%
Hitman 3 30−35
+17.9%
27−30
−17.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+17.4%
21−24
−17.4%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+15.4%
12−14
−15.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+22.7%
21−24
−22.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+26.7%
14−16
−26.7%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+21.1%
35−40
−21.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+20.7%
27−30
−20.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+21.2%
30−35
−21.2%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+20%
35−40
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
+36.4%
10−12
−36.4%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Hitman 3 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+23.5%
16−18
−23.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+26.3%
18−20
−26.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
+17.6%
16−18
−17.6%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T2000 Mobile is 36.4% faster than the T1000 Max-Q.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, T2000 Mobile surpassed T1000 Max-Q in all 68 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 20.60 17.33
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 35 Watt

The Quadro T2000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1000 Max-Q in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Quadro T2000 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Quadro T1000 Max-Q

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 252 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 16 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.