Arc A550M vs Quadro T2000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

T2000 Mobile
2019
4 GB GDDR5, 60 Watt
20.67

Arc A550M outperforms Quadro T2000 Mobile by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking249214
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.85no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)Xe HPG (2020−2022)
GPU code nameN19P-Q3Alchemist
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price$2221 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores102416
Core clock speed1575 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1785 MHz2005 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt80 Watt (60 - 80 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate114.2115.2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro T2000 Mobile and Arc A550M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed8000 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−15.2%
35−40
+15.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−15%
45−50
+15%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−17.1%
40−45
+17.1%
Battlefield 5 65−70
−14.7%
75−80
+14.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−14.3%
45−50
+14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−15.2%
35−40
+15.2%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−14.6%
55−60
+14.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
−12.7%
60−65
+12.7%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−11.8%
100−110
+11.8%
Hitman 3 40−45
−17.1%
45−50
+17.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−14.6%
90−95
+14.6%
Metro Exodus 65−70
−13%
75−80
+13%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
−14.3%
60−65
+14.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
−19.1%
80−85
+19.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−9.7%
65−70
+9.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−15%
45−50
+15%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−17.1%
40−45
+17.1%
Battlefield 5 65−70
−14.7%
75−80
+14.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−14.3%
45−50
+14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−15.2%
35−40
+15.2%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−14.6%
55−60
+14.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
−12.7%
60−65
+12.7%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−11.8%
100−110
+11.8%
Hitman 3 40−45
−17.1%
45−50
+17.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−14.6%
90−95
+14.6%
Metro Exodus 65−70
−13%
75−80
+13%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
−14.3%
60−65
+14.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
−19.1%
80−85
+19.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−17.8%
50−55
+17.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−9.7%
65−70
+9.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−15%
45−50
+15%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−17.1%
40−45
+17.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−14.3%
45−50
+14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−15.2%
35−40
+15.2%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−14.6%
55−60
+14.6%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−11.8%
100−110
+11.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−14.6%
90−95
+14.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
−19.1%
80−85
+19.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−17.8%
50−55
+17.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−9.7%
65−70
+9.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
−14.3%
60−65
+14.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−12.5%
45−50
+12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−19%
50−55
+19%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−19%
24−27
+19%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−21.1%
21−24
+21.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−18.5%
30−35
+18.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−25%
14−16
+25%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−17.1%
40−45
+17.1%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−17.5%
45−50
+17.5%
Hitman 3 24−27
−16.7%
27−30
+16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−16.7%
45−50
+16.7%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−15.4%
45−50
+15.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−18.6%
50−55
+18.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−20.8%
27−30
+20.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−21.4%
16−18
+21.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−17.6%
40−45
+17.6%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
−15%
21−24
+15%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Hitman 3 16−18
−18.8%
18−20
+18.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−17.4%
27−30
+17.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−19%
24−27
+19%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
−18.2%
12−14
+18.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−18.2%
12−14
+18.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−18.2%
12−14
+18.2%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−14.3%
30−35
+14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−17.4%
27−30
+17.4%
Metro Exodus 20−22
−15%
21−24
+15%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A550M is 25% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Arc A550M surpassed T2000 Mobile in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.67 23.74
Recency 27 May 2019 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 80 Watt

The Arc A550M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T2000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Arc A550M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Quadro T2000 Mobile
Intel Arc A550M
Arc A550M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 304 votes

Rate Quadro T2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 67 votes

Rate Arc A550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.