Arc A350M vs Quadro T2000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T2000 Mobile with Arc A350M, including specs and performance data.

T2000 Mobile
2019
4 GB GDDR5, 60 Watt
20.68
+44.5%

T2000 Mobile outperforms Arc A350M by a considerable 45% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking249342
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.86no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)Xe HPG (2020−2022)
GPU code nameN19P-Q3Alchemist
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price$2221 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10246
Core clock speed1575 MHz1150 MHz
Boost clock speed1785 MHz1150 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt35 Watt (25 - 35 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate114.255.20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro T2000 Mobile and Arc A350M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed8000 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T2000 Mobile 20.68
+44.5%
Arc A350M 14.31

Quadro T2000 Mobile outperforms Arc A350M by 45% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

T2000 Mobile 13524
+26%
Arc A350M 10730

Quadro T2000 Mobile outperforms Arc A350M by 26% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50−55
+38.9%
36
−38.9%
1440p24−27
+33.3%
18
−33.3%
4K10−12
+25%
8
−25%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40 no data
Battlefield 5 65−70 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 no data
Far Cry 5 45−50 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60 no data
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 no data
Hitman 3 40−45 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85 no data
Metro Exodus 65−70 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40 no data
Battlefield 5 65−70 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 no data
Far Cry 5 45−50 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60 no data
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 no data
Hitman 3 40−45 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85 no data
Metro Exodus 65−70 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 no data
Far Cry 5 45−50 no data
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 no data
Far Cry 5 35−40 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
Hitman 3 24−27 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45 no data
Metro Exodus 35−40 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18 no data
Hitman 3 16−18 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 no data
Far Cry 5 10−12 no data
Forza Horizon 4 27−30 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24 no data
Metro Exodus 20−22 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20 no data

This is how T2000 Mobile and Arc A350M compete in popular games:

  • T2000 Mobile is 39% faster in 1080p
  • T2000 Mobile is 33% faster in 1440p
  • T2000 Mobile is 25% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.68 14.31
Recency 27 May 2019 30 March 2022
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 35 Watt

The Quadro T2000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A350M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Arc A350M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Quadro T2000 Mobile
Intel Arc A350M
Arc A350M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 305 votes

Rate Quadro T2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 54 votes

Rate Arc A350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.