Arc A550M vs Quadro T1000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T1000 Mobile with Arc A550M, including specs and performance data.

T1000 Mobile
2019
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
14.64

Arc A550M outperforms T1000 Mobile by a considerable 45% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking338240
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.2327.99
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameTU117DG2-512
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682048
Core clock speed1395 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate69.84262.4
Floating-point processing power2.235 TFLOPS8.397 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs48128
Tensor Coresno data256
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5-
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

T1000 Mobile 14.64
Arc A550M 21.17
+44.6%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

T1000 Mobile 8727
Arc A550M 14350
+64.4%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

T1000 Mobile 3261
Arc A550M 5830
+78.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD63
−42.9%
90−95
+42.9%
4K48
−35.4%
65−70
+35.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
−53.7%
60−65
+53.7%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
−47.8%
130−140
+47.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−51.5%
50−55
+51.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
−53.7%
60−65
+53.7%
Battlefield 5 60
−53.3%
90−95
+53.3%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
−47.8%
130−140
+47.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−51.5%
50−55
+51.5%
Far Cry 5 62
−24.2%
75−80
+24.2%
Fortnite 85−90
−30.7%
110−120
+30.7%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−39.4%
90−95
+39.4%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
−45.1%
70−75
+45.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−52.5%
90−95
+52.5%
Valorant 120−130
−26.8%
160−170
+26.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
−53.7%
60−65
+53.7%
Battlefield 5 52
−76.9%
90−95
+76.9%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
−47.8%
130−140
+47.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
−21.7%
250−260
+21.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−51.5%
50−55
+51.5%
Dota 2 114
−5.3%
120−130
+5.3%
Far Cry 5 57
−35.1%
75−80
+35.1%
Fortnite 85−90
−30.7%
110−120
+30.7%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−39.4%
90−95
+39.4%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
−45.1%
70−75
+45.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 68
−25%
85−90
+25%
Metro Exodus 34
−50%
50−55
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−52.5%
90−95
+52.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 63
−9.5%
65−70
+9.5%
Valorant 120−130
−26.8%
160−170
+26.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 47
−95.7%
90−95
+95.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−51.5%
50−55
+51.5%
Dota 2 107
−12.1%
120−130
+12.1%
Far Cry 5 53
−45.3%
75−80
+45.3%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−39.4%
90−95
+39.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−52.5%
90−95
+52.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
−97.1%
65−70
+97.1%
Valorant 120−130
−26.8%
160−170
+26.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 85−90
−30.7%
110−120
+30.7%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−59.4%
50−55
+59.4%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
−39.3%
160−170
+39.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−61.5%
40−45
+61.5%
Metro Exodus 20−22
−55%
30−35
+55%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
−13%
170−180
+13%
Valorant 160−170
−25%
200−210
+25%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−44.4%
65−70
+44.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−64.3%
21−24
+64.3%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−51.4%
50−55
+51.4%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−47.5%
55−60
+47.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−56%
35−40
+56%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
−52.8%
55−60
+52.8%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−76.9%
21−24
+76.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
−48.3%
40−45
+48.3%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−58.3%
18−20
+58.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−54.5%
30−35
+54.5%
Valorant 85−90
−52.3%
130−140
+52.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−52.2%
35−40
+52.2%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−76.9%
21−24
+76.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Dota 2 48
−58.3%
75−80
+58.3%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−52.9%
24−27
+52.9%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−46.4%
40−45
+46.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
−56.3%
24−27
+56.3%

This is how T1000 Mobile and Arc A550M compete in popular games:

  • Arc A550M is 43% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A550M is 35% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A550M is 97% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Arc A550M surpassed T1000 Mobile in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.64 21.17
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 60 Watt

T1000 Mobile has 20% lower power consumption.

Arc A550M, on the other hand, has a 44.6% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A550M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T1000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Arc A550M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile
Quadro T1000
Intel Arc A550M
Arc A550M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 165 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 81 vote

Rate Arc A550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro T1000 Mobile or Arc A550M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.