Arc A350M vs Quadro T1200 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T1200 Mobile with Arc A350M, including specs and performance data.

T1200 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 18 Watt
19.46
+33%

T1200 Mobile outperforms Arc A350M by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking290358
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency74.4240.28
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameTU117DG2-128
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024768
Core clock speed855 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1425 MHz1150 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate91.2055.20
Floating-point processing power2.918 TFLOPS1.766 TFLOPS
ROPs3224
TMUs6448
Ray Tracing Coresno data6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T1200 Mobile 19.46
+33%
Arc A350M 14.63

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

T1200 Mobile 14387
+34.1%
Arc A350M 10730

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

T1200 Mobile 44135
+42.3%
Arc A350M 31023

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

T1200 Mobile 10134
+41.8%
Arc A350M 7147

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

T1200 Mobile 50827
+40%
Arc A350M 36315

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD58
+65.7%
35
−65.7%
1440p33
+106%
16
−106%
4K81
+913%
8
−913%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+44.4%
27
−44.4%
Elden Ring 53
+141%
22
−141%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+29.2%
45−50
−29.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
+88.9%
9
−88.9%
Elden Ring 47
+34.3%
35−40
−34.3%
Far Cry 5 65
+44.4%
45−50
−44.4%
Fortnite 100−110
+38.7%
75−80
−38.7%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+24.2%
66
−24.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+38.9%
95−100
−38.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+25%
35−40
−25%
Valorant 75−80
+41.1%
56
−41.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+29.2%
45−50
−29.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
+75%
8
−75%
Dota 2 114
+200%
38
−200%
Elden Ring 38
−10.5%
42
+10.5%
Far Cry 5 59
+119%
27
−119%
Fortnite 100−110
+26.8%
80−85
−26.8%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+54.7%
53
−54.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 71
+173%
26
−173%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+30%
40−45
−30%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+24.5%
100−110
−24.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+25%
35−40
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
+57.8%
45−50
−57.8%
Valorant 75−80
+36.2%
55−60
−36.2%
World of Tanks 220−230
+19.4%
190−200
−19.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+29.2%
45−50
−29.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+83.3%
6
−83.3%
Dota 2 107
+81.4%
59
−81.4%
Far Cry 5 56
+3.7%
50−55
−3.7%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+82.2%
45
−82.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+24.5%
100−110
−24.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+37%
27−30
−37%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
+38.7%
75−80
−38.7%

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring 30−35
+88.2%
17
−88.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+270%
10
−270%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+46.7%
30−33
−46.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+30.8%
12−14
−30.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Valorant 50−55
+42.9%
35−40
−42.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+37.9%
27−30
−37.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
Far Cry 5 41
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+35.1%
37
−35.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
+42.9%
35−40
−42.9%

4K
High Preset

Elden Ring 14−16
+367%
3
−367%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+200%
11
−200%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+200%
11
−200%
Valorant 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Dota 2 109
+319%
24−27
−319%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+52.6%
19
−52.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+45%
40−45
−45%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 10
+0%
10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
World of Tanks 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 11
+0%
11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how T1200 Mobile and Arc A350M compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 66% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 106% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 913% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Elden Ring, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the T1200 Mobile is 367% faster.
  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A350M is 57% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is ahead in 42 tests (67%)
  • Arc A350M is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • there's a draw in 19 tests (30%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.46 14.63
Recency 12 April 2021 30 March 2022
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 25 Watt

T1200 Mobile has a 33% higher aggregate performance score, and 38.9% lower power consumption.

Arc A350M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A350M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Arc A350M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200 Mobile
Intel Arc A350M
Arc A350M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 144 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 57 votes

Rate Arc A350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.