Radeon RX 7600S vs Quadro T2000 Max-Q

Place in performance ranking	286	124
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	RDNA 3
GPU code name	N19P-Q3 MAX-Q	Navi 33
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	27 May 2019 (4 years ago)	5 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	1792
Core clock speed	930 / 1200 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1500 / 1620 MHz	1865 MHz
Number of transistors	4,700 million	13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 - 40 Watt	75 Watt (50 - 75 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	103.7	224.0

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro T2000 Max-Q and Radeon RX 7600S compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	256.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	7.5	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T2000 Max-Q 17.88

RX 7600S 36.38
+103%

Radeon RX 7600S outperforms Quadro T2000 Max-Q by 103% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

T2000 Max-Q 6923

RX 7600S 14087
+103%

Radeon RX 7600S outperforms Quadro T2000 Max-Q by 103% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

T2000 Max-Q 39269

RX 7600S 79339
+102%

Radeon RX 7600S outperforms Quadro T2000 Max-Q by 102% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

T2000 Max-Q 11461

RX 7600S 34218
+199%

Radeon RX 7600S outperforms Quadro T2000 Max-Q by 199% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

T2000 Max-Q 8262

RX 7600S 25900
+214%

Radeon RX 7600S outperforms Quadro T2000 Max-Q by 214% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

T2000 Max-Q 41106

RX 7600S 155806
+279%

Radeon RX 7600S outperforms Quadro T2000 Max-Q by 279% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	58 −82.8%	106 +82.8%
1440p	26 −119%	57 +119%
4K	38 +31%	29 −31%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

27−30

−125%

60−65
+125%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	53 −24.5%	65−70 +24.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 −300%	124 +300%
Battlefield 5	60−65 −80%	100−110 +80%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −115%	95−100 +115%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −268%	103 +268%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −136%	111 +136%
Far Cry New Dawn	58 −53.4%	85−90 +53.4%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −82.3%	110−120 +82.3%
Hitman 3	50−55 −249%	178 +249%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −108%	75−80 +108%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 −103%	55−60 +103%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	56 −55.4%	85−90 +55.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −250%	119 +250%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45 −46.7%	65−70 +46.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 −229%	102 +229%
Battlefield 5	60−65 −80%	100−110 +80%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −115%	95−100 +115%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −200%	84 +200%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −128%	107 +128%
Far Cry New Dawn	55 −61.8%	85−90 +61.8%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −82.3%	110−120 +82.3%
Hitman 3	50−55 −198%	152 +198%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −108%	75−80 +108%
Metro Exodus	33 −18.2%	39 +18.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 −103%	55−60 +103%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45 −93.3%	85−90 +93.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	63 −152%	159 +152%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −215%	107 +215%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	25 −164%	65−70 +164%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 −184%	88 +184%
Battlefield 5	60−65 −80%	100−110 +80%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −150%	70 +150%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −117%	102 +117%
Far Cry New Dawn	50 −78%	85−90 +78%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −82.3%	110−120 +82.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	33 −188%	95 +188%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −106%	70 +106%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −131%	60−65 +131%
Hitman 3	27−30 −136%	65−70 +136%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −108%	50−55 +108%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −129%	35−40 +129%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −123%	27−30 +123%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −135%	50−55 +135%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −111%	40−45 +111%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −150%	40−45 +150%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −97.4%	75−80 +97.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −330%	43 +330%
Far Cry 5	30−33 −120%	65−70 +120%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −103%	65−70 +103%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −111%	75−80 +111%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −168%	50−55 +168%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 −167%	30−35 +167%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −146%	30−35 +146%
Hitman 3	16−18 −112%	35−40 +112%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −125%	27−30 +125%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −150%	24−27 +150%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −90%	18−20 +90%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −155%	27−30 +155%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −139%	40−45 +139%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12 −118%	24−27 +118%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 −144%	21−24 +144%
Battlefield 5	20−22 −120%	40−45 +120%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −500%	18 +500%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −143%	30−35 +143%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 −124%	35−40 +124%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −104%	50−55 +104%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%

This is how T2000 Max-Q and RX 7600S compete in popular games:

RX 7600S is 82.8% faster than T2000 Max-Q in 1080p
RX 7600S is 119% faster than T2000 Max-Q in 1440p
T2000 Max-Q is 31% faster than RX 7600S in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7600S is 500% faster than the T2000 Max-Q.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RX 7600S surpassed T2000 Max-Q in all 68 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	17.88	36.38
Recency	27 May 2019	5 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	75 Watt