Radeon RX 7600S vs Quadro T1000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

T1000 Mobile
2019
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
16.92

Radeon RX 7600S outperforms Quadro T1000 Mobile by a whopping 116% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking302120
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.15no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)RDNA 3
GPU code nameN19P-Q1Navi 33
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)5 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price$1890 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681792
Core clock speed1395 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1455 MHz1865 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt75 Watt (50 - 75 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate69.84224.0

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro T1000 Mobile and Radeon RX 7600S compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed8000 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T1000 Mobile 16.92
RX 7600S 36.48
+116%

Radeon RX 7600S outperforms Quadro T1000 Mobile by 116% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

T1000 Mobile 6540
RX 7600S 14103
+116%

Radeon RX 7600S outperforms Quadro T1000 Mobile by 116% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

T1000 Mobile 11377
RX 7600S 34218
+201%

Radeon RX 7600S outperforms Quadro T1000 Mobile by 201% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

T1000 Mobile 31509
RX 7600S 79339
+152%

Radeon RX 7600S outperforms Quadro T1000 Mobile by 152% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

T1000 Mobile 8727
RX 7600S 25900
+197%

Radeon RX 7600S outperforms Quadro T1000 Mobile by 197% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

T1000 Mobile 53629
RX 7600S 155806
+191%

Radeon RX 7600S outperforms Quadro T1000 Mobile by 191% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD64
−60.9%
103
+60.9%
1440p24−27
−117%
52
+117%
4K48
+71.4%
28
−71.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−133%
60−65
+133%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 48
−35.4%
65−70
+35.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−343%
124
+343%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−115%
110−120
+115%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 53
−52.8%
80−85
+52.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−281%
103
+281%
Far Cry 5 49
−57.1%
75−80
+57.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−97.9%
90−95
+97.9%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−98.2%
110−120
+98.2%
Hitman 3 40−45
−345%
178
+345%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−145%
130−140
+145%
Metro Exodus 83
−15.7%
95−100
+15.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 67
−34.3%
90−95
+34.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−375%
228
+375%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−284%
119
+284%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 43
−51.2%
65−70
+51.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−264%
102
+264%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−115%
110−120
+115%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 51
−58.8%
80−85
+58.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−211%
84
+211%
Far Cry 5 69
+23.2%
56
−23.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 23
−304%
90−95
+304%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−98.2%
110−120
+98.2%
Hitman 3 40−45
−128%
90−95
+128%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−145%
130−140
+145%
Metro Exodus 46
−109%
95−100
+109%
Red Dead Redemption 2 58
−55.2%
90−95
+55.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 23
−313%
95
+313%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 63
−152%
159
+152%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−245%
107
+245%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 29
−124%
65−70
+124%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−214%
88
+214%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 32
−153%
80−85
+153%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−159%
70
+159%
Far Cry 5 31
−148%
75−80
+148%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−98.2%
110−120
+98.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−145%
130−140
+145%
Metro Exodus 43
−123%
95−100
+123%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
−171%
95
+171%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−126%
70
+126%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50
−80%
90−95
+80%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−112%
70−75
+112%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−163%
80−85
+163%
Hitman 3 24−27
−104%
45−50
+104%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−142%
27−30
+142%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−122%
40−45
+122%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−162%
55−60
+162%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−378%
43
+378%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−136%
65−70
+136%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−130%
75−80
+130%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−129%
75−80
+129%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−123%
65−70
+123%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−172%
85−90
+172%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−183%
50−55
+183%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
−182%
30−35
+182%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 35−40
−68.6%
55−60
+68.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−156%
45−50
+156%
Hitman 3 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−150%
45−50
+150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−155%
27−30
+155%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−153%
40−45
+153%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−140%
24−27
+140%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−175%
21−24
+175%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−132%
40−45
+132%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−183%
30−35
+183%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−500%
18
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−117%
50−55
+117%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−150%
45−50
+150%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−138%
35−40
+138%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−113%
30−35
+113%

This is how T1000 Mobile and RX 7600S compete in popular games:

  • RX 7600S is 61% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7600S is 117% faster in 1440p
  • T1000 Mobile is 71% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the T1000 Mobile is 23% faster.
  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7600S is 500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T1000 Mobile is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • RX 7600S is ahead in 71 test (99%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.92 36.48
Recency 27 May 2019 5 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 75 Watt

The Radeon RX 7600S is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T1000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 7600S is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile
Quadro T1000 Mobile
AMD Radeon RX 7600S
Radeon RX 7600S

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 134 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 169 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.