GeForce RTX 4050 vs Quadro T1200 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T1200 Mobile with GeForce RTX 4050, including specs and performance data.

T1200 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 18 Watt
19.46

RTX 4050 outperforms T1200 Mobile by an impressive 93% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking290124
Place by popularitynot in top-10041
Power efficiency74.4225.80
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTU117AD107
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10242560
Core clock speed855 MHz2505 MHz
Boost clock speed1425 MHz2640 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate91.20211.2
Floating-point processing power2.918 TFLOPS13.52 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs6480
Tensor Coresno data120
Ray Tracing Coresno data18

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s216.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA7.58.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD58
−89.7%
110−120
+89.7%
1440p33
−81.8%
60−65
+81.8%
4K81
−85.2%
150−160
+85.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−92.3%
75−80
+92.3%
Elden Ring 53
−88.7%
100−105
+88.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−77.4%
110−120
+77.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
−76.5%
30−33
+76.5%
Elden Ring 47
−91.5%
90−95
+91.5%
Far Cry 5 65
−84.6%
120−130
+84.6%
Fortnite 100−110
−92.3%
200−210
+92.3%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−82.9%
150−160
+82.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
−89.4%
250−260
+89.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−88.9%
85−90
+88.9%
Valorant 75−80
−89.9%
150−160
+89.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−77.4%
110−120
+77.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%
Dota 2 114
−84.2%
210−220
+84.2%
Elden Ring 38
−84.2%
70−75
+84.2%
Far Cry 5 59
−86.4%
110−120
+86.4%
Fortnite 100−110
−92.3%
200−210
+92.3%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−82.9%
150−160
+82.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 71
−83.1%
130−140
+83.1%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−92.3%
100−105
+92.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
−89.4%
250−260
+89.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−88.9%
85−90
+88.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
−83.1%
130−140
+83.1%
Valorant 75−80
−89.9%
150−160
+89.9%
World of Tanks 220−230
−75.4%
400−450
+75.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−77.4%
110−120
+77.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
−90.9%
21−24
+90.9%
Dota 2 107
−86.9%
200−210
+86.9%
Far Cry 5 56
−78.6%
100−105
+78.6%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−82.9%
150−160
+82.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
−89.4%
250−260
+89.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
−89.2%
70−75
+89.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
−92.3%
200−210
+92.3%

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring 30−35
−87.5%
60−65
+87.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
−89.2%
70−75
+89.2%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−81.8%
80−85
+81.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−76.5%
30−33
+76.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−92.3%
50−55
+92.3%
Valorant 50−55
−90%
95−100
+90%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−87.5%
75−80
+87.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Far Cry 5 41
−82.9%
75−80
+82.9%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−90%
95−100
+90%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
−90%
95−100
+90%

4K
High Preset

Elden Ring 14−16
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−81.8%
60−65
+81.8%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−75%
21−24
+75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−81.8%
60−65
+81.8%
Valorant 21−24
−73.9%
40−45
+73.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−84.2%
35−40
+84.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Dota 2 109
−92.7%
210−220
+92.7%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−80%
45−50
+80%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−89.7%
55−60
+89.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−89.7%
110−120
+89.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
−73.9%
40−45
+73.9%

This is how T1200 Mobile and RTX 4050 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4050 is 90% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4050 is 82% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4050 is 85% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.46 37.51
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 100 Watt

T1200 Mobile has 455.6% lower power consumption.

RTX 4050, on the other hand, has a 92.8% higher aggregate performance score, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4050 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1200 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 4050 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200 Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
GeForce RTX 4050

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 144 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 2166 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.