RTX 4000 Mobile vs T1000 Mobile

Buy
VS
Buy
Price now 2890$
Games supported 97%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
Buy
  • Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
  • Core clock speed 1110
  • Max video memory 8 GB
  • Memory type GDDR6
  • Memory clock speed 14000
  • Maximum resolution
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile
Buy
  • Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
  • Core clock speed 1395
  • Max video memory 4 GB
  • Memory type GDDR5
  • Memory clock speed 8000
  • Maximum resolution
Price now 1890$
Games supported 97%

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in performance rating97114
Value for money6.6310.09
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameN19E-Q3N19P-Q1
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date27 May 2019 (3 years ago)27 May 2019 (3 years ago)
Current price$2890 $1890
Value for money

To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.

  • 0
  • 50
  • 100
  • 0
  • 50
  • 100

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560768
Core clock speed1110 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHz1455 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)110 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate249.669.84

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and Quadro T1000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support+no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.57.5

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4000 Mobile 43.68
+10.7%
T1000 Mobile 39.46
  • 3DMark Vantage Performance
  • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
  • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Score
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
  • 3DMark Ice Storm GPU
  • SPECviewperf 12 - Maya
  • SPECviewperf 12 - Catia
  • SPECviewperf 12 - Creo
  • SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 4000 Mobile 56250
+78.5%
T1000 Mobile 31509

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 4000 Mobile 25371
+123%
T1000 Mobile 11377

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 4000 Mobile 119052
+122%
T1000 Mobile 53629

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 4000 Mobile 16903
+117%
T1000 Mobile 7783

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

RTX 4000 Mobile 18849
+116%
T1000 Mobile 8727

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

RTX 4000 Mobile 445161
+18.5%
T1000 Mobile 375510

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

Benchmark coverage: 2%

RTX 4000 Mobile 144
+156%
T1000 Mobile 56

Benchmark coverage: 2%

RTX 4000 Mobile 162
+84.6%
T1000 Mobile 88

Benchmark coverage: 2%

RTX 4000 Mobile 141
+77.2%
T1000 Mobile 79

Benchmark coverage: 2%

RTX 4000 Mobile 62
+109%
T1000 Mobile 30

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD107
+69.8%
63
−69.8%
1440p63no data
4K44
−9.1%
48
+9.1%

Popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+12.8%
35−40
−12.8%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 87
+81.3%
48
−81.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+12.8%
35−40
−12.8%
Battlefield 5 101
+68.3%
60
−68.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−38.6%
61
+38.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+12.8%
35−40
−12.8%
Far Cry 5 106
+71%
62
−71%
Far Cry New Dawn 103
+115%
48
−115%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+12.8%
35−40
−12.8%
Hitman 3 40−45
+12.8%
35−40
−12.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+12.8%
35−40
−12.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−6.8%
47
+6.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 105
+84.2%
57
−84.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+12.8%
35−40
−12.8%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75
+74.4%
43
−74.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+12.8%
35−40
−12.8%
Battlefield 5 87
+67.3%
52
−67.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−6.8%
47
+6.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+12.8%
35−40
−12.8%
Far Cry 5 100
+75.4%
57
−75.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 101
+120%
46
−120%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+12.8%
35−40
−12.8%
Hitman 3 40−45
+12.8%
35−40
−12.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+12.8%
35−40
−12.8%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+29.4%
34
−29.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+76%
25
−76%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 83
+72.9%
48
−72.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 143
+127%
63
−127%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+12.8%
35−40
−12.8%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 54
+86.2%
29
−86.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+12.8%
35−40
−12.8%
Battlefield 5 81
+72.3%
47
−72.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+12.8%
35−40
−12.8%
Far Cry 5 96
+81.1%
53
−81.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 91
+112%
43
−112%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+12.8%
35−40
−12.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75
+114%
35
−114%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+12.8%
35−40
−12.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+12.8%
35−40
−12.8%
Hitman 3 40−45
+12.8%
35−40
−12.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+12.8%
35−40
−12.8%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+12.8%
35−40
−12.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+12.8%
35−40
−12.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 57
+46.2%
35−40
−46.2%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 41
+5.1%
35−40
−5.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+12.8%
35−40
−12.8%
Battlefield 5 66
+69.2%
35−40
−69.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+12.8%
35−40
−12.8%
Far Cry 5 69
+76.9%
35−40
−76.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 77
+97.4%
35−40
−97.4%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+12.8%
35−40
−12.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+12.8%
35−40
−12.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+12.8%
35−40
−12.8%
Hitman 3 40−45
+12.8%
35−40
−12.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+12.8%
35−40
−12.8%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+12.8%
35−40
−12.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+12.8%
35−40
−12.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30
−30%
35−40
+30%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+30.8%
35−40
−30.8%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 28
−39.3%
35−40
+39.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+12.8%
35−40
−12.8%
Battlefield 5 42
+7.7%
35−40
−7.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+12.8%
35−40
−12.8%
Far Cry 5 36
−8.3%
35−40
+8.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 43
+10.3%
35−40
−10.3%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+12.8%
35−40
−12.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+12.8%
35−40
−12.8%

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance rating 43.68 39.46
Memory bus width 256 128
Pipelines / CUDA cores 2560 768
Memory bandwidth 448 128
Thermal design power (TDP) 110 Watt 50 Watt

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

since it shows better performance.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Competitors of Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile by AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile from AMD is Radeon Pro 5600M, which is slower by 29% and lower by 63 positions in our rating.

AMD Radeon Pro 5600M Radeon Pro 5600M
Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile:

Competitors of Quadro T1000 Mobile by AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Quadro T1000 Mobile from AMD is Radeon Pro 5600M, which is slower by 22% and lower by 46 positions in our rating.

AMD Radeon Pro 5600M Radeon Pro 5600M
Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro T1000 Mobile:

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 13 ratings

Rate NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 42 ratings

Rate NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.